Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ok, Tulsi Gabbard; help me understand [View all]JTFrog
(14,274 posts)45. The Curious Islamophobic Politics of Dem Congressmember Tulsi Gabbard
http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/curious-islamophobic-politics-dem-congressmember-tulsi-gabbard
She's particularly a favorite of right-wing media. Appearing with Fox's Neil Cavuto last week, she lashed out at the White House for holding an extremism summit with Muslim Americans, saying it's a diversion from what our real focus needs to be. And that focus is on that Islamic extremist threat. She criticized Obama for saying that poverty, lack of access to jobs, lack of access to education is contributing to radicalization. They are not fueled by materialistic motivation, it's actually a theological, this radical Islamic ideology, she said, throwing red meat to Fox viewers.
~~~~~
To Gabbard, the fact that Syria and Iraq have been through years of brutal civil war, wrecked economies and massive displacement is irrelevant; the only reason they have an extremism problem is because of Islamic theology.
But the case of Tulsi Gabbard becomes less curious and more expected once you look at her links to a different set of ethnic and religious hardliners: the Hindu nationalist Indian Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Since her election to Congress, Gabbard has tied herself closely to this party, which has a history of condoning hatred and violence against India's Muslim minority. Many of her stateside donors and supporters are also big supporters of this movement, which disdains secularism and promotes religious sectarianism.
Meet the Islamophobic BJP
In May 2014, the BJP swept the Indian election, and the man it made prime minister was then-governor of the state of Gujarat, Narendra Modi. To say Modi is a controversial figure would be a considerable understatement. In 2002, huge riots broke out in his state, with primarily Hindu mobs attacking Muslim residents. Over 2,000 men, women, and children were killed, with many more injured; mass rape was also documented. Almost all of the victims were Muslim.
~~~~
The more important point is that her backers are all ideological backers of the BJP, which represents the right-wing, Hindu nationalist wing of Indian politics. Most Indian Americans actually support more progressive politicians; 81 percent of Indian Americans approved of Obama's job approval in 2012, and polling before the presidential election that year found only 5 percent of Indian Americans pledged to back GOP nominee Mitt Romney.
~~~~
Gabbard has one other curious alliance. Under Prime Minister Modi, India has sought increasingly close relations to Israel, shifting the country's historical support for the Palestinian cause. Perhaps Gabbard is a sort of consigliere for this alliance of Hindu nationalists and right-wing Zionists, as she is the only House Democrat backing a bill basically designed to benefit one of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's closest political allies, Sheldon Adelson. The bill is part of a crackdown on online gambling that Adelson is promoting in order to destroy competition to his casino chain.
She's particularly a favorite of right-wing media. Appearing with Fox's Neil Cavuto last week, she lashed out at the White House for holding an extremism summit with Muslim Americans, saying it's a diversion from what our real focus needs to be. And that focus is on that Islamic extremist threat. She criticized Obama for saying that poverty, lack of access to jobs, lack of access to education is contributing to radicalization. They are not fueled by materialistic motivation, it's actually a theological, this radical Islamic ideology, she said, throwing red meat to Fox viewers.
~~~~~
To Gabbard, the fact that Syria and Iraq have been through years of brutal civil war, wrecked economies and massive displacement is irrelevant; the only reason they have an extremism problem is because of Islamic theology.
But the case of Tulsi Gabbard becomes less curious and more expected once you look at her links to a different set of ethnic and religious hardliners: the Hindu nationalist Indian Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Since her election to Congress, Gabbard has tied herself closely to this party, which has a history of condoning hatred and violence against India's Muslim minority. Many of her stateside donors and supporters are also big supporters of this movement, which disdains secularism and promotes religious sectarianism.
Meet the Islamophobic BJP
In May 2014, the BJP swept the Indian election, and the man it made prime minister was then-governor of the state of Gujarat, Narendra Modi. To say Modi is a controversial figure would be a considerable understatement. In 2002, huge riots broke out in his state, with primarily Hindu mobs attacking Muslim residents. Over 2,000 men, women, and children were killed, with many more injured; mass rape was also documented. Almost all of the victims were Muslim.
~~~~
The more important point is that her backers are all ideological backers of the BJP, which represents the right-wing, Hindu nationalist wing of Indian politics. Most Indian Americans actually support more progressive politicians; 81 percent of Indian Americans approved of Obama's job approval in 2012, and polling before the presidential election that year found only 5 percent of Indian Americans pledged to back GOP nominee Mitt Romney.
~~~~
Gabbard has one other curious alliance. Under Prime Minister Modi, India has sought increasingly close relations to Israel, shifting the country's historical support for the Palestinian cause. Perhaps Gabbard is a sort of consigliere for this alliance of Hindu nationalists and right-wing Zionists, as she is the only House Democrat backing a bill basically designed to benefit one of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's closest political allies, Sheldon Adelson. The bill is part of a crackdown on online gambling that Adelson is promoting in order to destroy competition to his casino chain.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
183 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In part because Hillary Clinton was in favor of military action against Assad.
That Guy 888
Apr 2017
#1
I see what you're saying and that is true. Clearly he wasn't an isolationist when faced with
JCanete
Apr 2017
#171
"a person who advocates an aggressive or warlike policy, especially in foreign affairs."
ehrnst
Apr 2017
#172
oh, I don't know....might have somthing to do with her defense of a genocidal dictator
hlthe2b
Apr 2017
#2
Plus, she's echoing the Putin/Assad line denying responsibility for the chemical weapons
synergie
Apr 2017
#5
Reminds me of Lindberg, Ford and others in the thirties-- "Mr. Hiter was such a fine fellow",
hlthe2b
Apr 2017
#8
Can you "google" Can you enter into "the google box" "Tulsi Gabbard defends Assad"?
hlthe2b
Apr 2017
#19
the reasons that you only provide links is that those links don't support your position
virtualobserver
Apr 2017
#77
Another straw man - Tulsi never said that she believed Putin/Assad.....she just wants it checked out
virtualobserver
Apr 2017
#83
I don't defend war criminals, liars or those who try to plant stories on their behalf
hlthe2b
Apr 2017
#84
Done with you because you defend a politico who supports a war criminal, genocide, & islamophobia
hlthe2b
Apr 2017
#88
No your post did not do anything of the kind. Enjoy the hell on earth this administration
hlthe2b
Apr 2017
#91
Don't worry.....maybe if we just overthrow Syria....that will fix everything
virtualobserver
Apr 2017
#92
So, just as the US and Russia are about to work together to attack ISIS....
virtualobserver
Apr 2017
#163
gabbard is providing cover for a war criminal-Why Tulsi Gabbard cant represent America at the United
Cha
Apr 2017
#108
"This is no different than Trump making excuses for Putin. Weve had enough of this.
Cha
Apr 2017
#121
As to condescension, those defending self-serving politicians who white wash crimes against humanity
hlthe2b
Apr 2017
#44
I don't know what Google you used, but I get 27,000 results. Try it without quotes.
randome
Apr 2017
#52
Shows what you don't know, mrliberal.. this was long before she defended meeting him
Cha
Apr 2017
#107
Who are the "good guys" that we should support? Or should America do all the heavy lifting?
That Guy 888
Apr 2017
#43
If someone was spouting the "Republican party line" we would criticize them for doing so
oberliner
Apr 2017
#102
Gabbard led the charge, as a Hawaii state representative, against legislation for same sex marriage
Cha
Apr 2017
#179
It's not. You keep agreeing with post removed all over the place though. Good on ya. nt
JTFrog
Apr 2017
#56
Bullshit. We've posted the FACTS about her Islamaphobic statements, her love of guns,
KittyWampus
Apr 2017
#27
It's so transparent what's going regarding Gabbard on DU. I and other DU'ers
KittyWampus
Apr 2017
#28
https://www.google.com/search?qTulsi+Gabbard&sitesearchdemocraticunderground.com
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#71
It has been suggested between Twitter and the Dossier that she was one of Trump's DNC moles
HoneyBadger
Apr 2017
#29
I have no problem believing that. Nor would I have trouble believing she was another Putin plant.
randome
Apr 2017
#33
Just curious, sincere question here: do you think FDR was right not to bomb Nazi rail lines?
Hekate
Apr 2017
#123
The Dossier was all about Trump (paid for by R and then D) and how Putin supported him
HoneyBadger
Apr 2017
#150
I can tell you exactly what it is. Tulsi Gabbard gave a CNN interview where she said
still_one
Apr 2017
#35
Lobbying missiles at an empty airbase is stupid. So is apologizing for brutal dicators.
Tommy_Carcetti
Apr 2017
#38
Since you took Franklin Roosevelt's initials, I assume you know his war-history. Not a pacifist.
Hekate
Apr 2017
#117
Several members of the alt-right are okay with interventionist government
forjusticethunders
Apr 2017
#168