Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The United Airline assault on a passenger is just another symptom of authoritarianism [View all]kcr
(15,522 posts)106. Yeah. A plan we paid them to be on!
It's perfectly reasonable for them to just arbitrarily kick paid passengers off for whatever reason they see fit, and beat them bloody when they refuse. You see absolutely nothing wrong with that? And we should just continue to be paid passengers? Well, you can choose to be, but I certainly won't.
I think it's entirely reasonable that consumers demand corporations have some measure of restraint.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
182 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The United Airline assault on a passenger is just another symptom of authoritarianism [View all]
nadine_mn
Apr 2017
OP
There's probably some small print that says "we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone"...
NurseJackie
Apr 2017
#2
Well, there is the right to refuse service vs the right not to leave bloodied
nadine_mn
Apr 2017
#13
Maybe if they would have offered cash instead of a voucher, someone would have taken it. (nt)
bekkilyn
Apr 2017
#121
Your ticket is conditional. If ordered to leave the plane you are legally obligated to leave
Statistical
Apr 2017
#33
Did that business rob me of the service I already paid for like United did to this gentleman?
bekkilyn
Apr 2017
#23
What bit of irrational absurdity leads you to believe he was trespassing?
LanternWaste
Apr 2017
#182
AFAIK, if you don't cooperate with crew instructions, you're interfering n/t
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Apr 2017
#103
For a good laugh, watch this video about United from a few years ago, over 16,000,000 Views
PuppyBismark
Apr 2017
#9
The problem isn't the money they offer. It's the uncertainty of knowing when you'll get out.
LisaM
Apr 2017
#41
They told people at the gate that they needed 4 people to give up seats and still boarded them
nadine_mn
Apr 2017
#65
After that first mistake of boarding all passengers, when the man refused to surrender his seat
delisen
Apr 2017
#162
The worst flight I ever had was on United. I promised myself to never use them again. nt
C Moon
Apr 2017
#18
For what it's worth, I just called this shitty airline and told them I would NEVER fly with them
BigDemVoter
Apr 2017
#22
I mean honestly - they could have really offered a sweet deal at really no cost to the airline
nadine_mn
Apr 2017
#46
Divided Airlines -I guess they figure it's them vs. us. Something about the tone of the
delisen
Apr 2017
#160
The issue is level of force - and I am stunned that you think this situation
nadine_mn
Apr 2017
#132
By law, a valid ticket means he CANNOT be a stowaway just for future reference
nadine_mn
Apr 2017
#133
what was LAWFUL about an order to remove himself from a seat he had paid for and
niyad
Apr 2017
#174
I fly standby all the time and am appalled they took paying passengers off to accommodate
kimbutgar
Apr 2017
#44
This law can be changed, and should be changed to a much higher amount.
No Vested Interest
Apr 2017
#99
This wasn't an overbooked flight. They wanted to bump a paying customer for their staff.
AgadorSparticus
Apr 2017
#90
Then you may have a lawsuit against them, not an inviolable right to sit on their plane
Azathoth
Apr 2017
#92
Private property does not mean they can treat you however they want to.
AgadorSparticus
Apr 2017
#97
Passenger was contractually on plane, contract did not provide for removal in this manner.
NutmegYankee
Apr 2017
#170
the flight was not "overbooked", it was full, and the airline wanted four of its employees
niyad
Apr 2017
#176
It's all about THE RULES! The RULES cannot be wrong, the RULES must always be obeyed.
Warren DeMontague
Apr 2017
#85
A simple solution would be to up the financial incentive to the next person being bumped.
Throck
Apr 2017
#102
+1, it wasn't needed... they could've done something else and that would've been easier
uponit7771
Apr 2017
#138
and the justifications for the "officers" behaviour, even on this board, is disgusting.
niyad
Apr 2017
#145
There are authoritarians on the left as well as the rights. Just follow orders. Obey.
delisen
Apr 2017
#161
Standing tall against the customer is usually a mistake. Yeah there is some rule, but to go all
The_Casual_Observer
Apr 2017
#154