Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Involuntary Bumping [View all]

hank1920

(9 posts)
6. youre wrong on the law...
Tue Apr 11, 2017, 07:37 AM
Apr 2017

fancy but wrong.

frpm another poster...

"Followed established procedures"...? United's own "Contract of Carriage" only allows passengers to be involuntarily denied boarding (Rule 25) before boarding. Once they've already boarded, Rule 25 goes out the window, and Rule 21 takes effect, which covers "refusal of transport" and only applies to specific circumstances, NONE of which applied in this incident.

Once passengers were boarded, United's only option was to keep raising the compensation until they got four passengers to accept it. Instead, it seems like they decided to lowball the situation by, first, simply declaring that four people had to leave, then offering far less than is justified under those circumstances, then calling in the thugs. All for poor planning, and the unwillingness to spend enough cash to work out an agreeable settlement. In the long run, it's likely going to be a case of "penny wise, pound foolish," as whatever they might have needed to pay to get volunteers will be a drop in the bucket compared to how much they are going to have to pay this passenger -- not to mention the millions in bad P.R.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Involuntary Bumping»Reply #6