This bothers me.

[Amimnoch]

28. You are incorrect.

To use Clinton.. as an example..

State department emails servers have been successfully hacked numerous times. Several while Clinton was SoS:

http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/10/politics/state-department-hack-worst-ever/index.html

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/state-department-email-system-hacked-shut-down/

http://www.computerworld.com/article/2592107/security0/state-department-site-hacked--servers-shut-down.html

http://www.computerworld.com/article/2582700/security0/u-s--state-department-site-hacked--servers-shut-down.html

http://dailycaller.com/2015/09/01/state-department-doesnt-know-if-hillarys-server-was-breached-still-cant-say-who-approved-home-brew-system-video/

Conversely, there's little evidence, and only a single claim of successful hacking:
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/04/us/politics/security-logs-of-hillary-clintons-email-server-are-said-to-show-no-evidence-of-hacking.html?_r=0

The hacker Guccifer had claimed to have successfully compromised the server, but has never been substantiated.


Now away from this Segway, and back onto the original topic.. Thank you for making my point beautifully though. I point out that our leadership can't even follow the rules without being attacked, and you rather beautifully illustrate my point with an attack on a single point, and accuse me of being a revisionist who uses Republican type of tactics.

Bravo.