Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: RED ALERT - Republicans are threatening to DEFUND SOCIAL SECURITY [View all]CousinIT
(12,541 posts)37. Another article on this from TPM. NO WAY would HRC E V E R have considered such a thing...
Social Security Advocates Sound The Alarm About The Latest Trump Tax Plan
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/social-security-tax-program-cuts
Following reports that President Donald Trump is dumping the tax plan he campaigned on and exploring a host of other options, advocates for Social Security are sounding the alarm, pointing to a proposal to eliminate the program's primary source of funding: payroll taxes.
Though it is not yet known how far along the White House proposal has progressed, those who want to protect Social Security say they are taking the news "extremely seriously."
"Even if this is just a trial balloon, we want to puncture it as quickly as we can, said Nancy Altman, the president of the advocacy group Social Security Works.
According to the Associated Press, lobbyists aligned with the Trump administration are pushing for the elimination of the 12.4 percent payroll tax, which is the overwhelming source of revenue for the Social Security trust funds, which provide benefits to the elderly and the disabled. The report published Monday details how they plan to sell the idea to lawmakers and the public:
This approach would give a worker earning $60,000 a year an additional $3,720 in take-home pay, a possible win that lawmakers could highlight back in their districts even though it would involve changing the funding mechanism for Social Security, according to the lobbyist, who asked for anonymity to discuss the proposal without disrupting early negotiations.
Altman, who told TPM that she only found out about this plan from press reports, called it a Trojan Horse.
"They will sell it as a tax cut for the middle class, but really this is undermining middle class economic security, and the ability to retire," she said. "Theyll say they're 'saving' Social Security, but basically they want to scale back or get rid of the program."
No other dedicated funding source has yet been floated to replace the payroll tax as a funding mechanism for Social Security, and the odds of Republicans supporting a new tax are slim.
Though it is not yet known how far along the White House proposal has progressed, those who want to protect Social Security say they are taking the news "extremely seriously."
"Even if this is just a trial balloon, we want to puncture it as quickly as we can, said Nancy Altman, the president of the advocacy group Social Security Works.
According to the Associated Press, lobbyists aligned with the Trump administration are pushing for the elimination of the 12.4 percent payroll tax, which is the overwhelming source of revenue for the Social Security trust funds, which provide benefits to the elderly and the disabled. The report published Monday details how they plan to sell the idea to lawmakers and the public:
This approach would give a worker earning $60,000 a year an additional $3,720 in take-home pay, a possible win that lawmakers could highlight back in their districts even though it would involve changing the funding mechanism for Social Security, according to the lobbyist, who asked for anonymity to discuss the proposal without disrupting early negotiations.
Altman, who told TPM that she only found out about this plan from press reports, called it a Trojan Horse.
"They will sell it as a tax cut for the middle class, but really this is undermining middle class economic security, and the ability to retire," she said. "Theyll say they're 'saving' Social Security, but basically they want to scale back or get rid of the program."
No other dedicated funding source has yet been floated to replace the payroll tax as a funding mechanism for Social Security, and the odds of Republicans supporting a new tax are slim.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/social-security-tax-program-cuts
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Democrats running in competative races this year need to use this AGAINST their R-opponent.
BlueCaliDem
Apr 2017
#2
The DIRTBAGS are on recess now and in their local offices. If you can get there..
CousinIT
Apr 2017
#6
AARP is all over it. I am on their emial list. THey even sent a snail mail about it today. Get the
Amaryllis
Apr 2017
#48
I believe the GOP is drooling for another Great Depression, so they can take us back to the
C Moon
Apr 2017
#14
"Capitalists will sell us the rope with which to hang them." Lenin - nt
KingCharlemagne
Apr 2017
#36
They CAN'T! SS is not funded by the gov't. t's funded by witholdings from your earnings.
napi21
Apr 2017
#16
I'm sorry, but something's wrong with your statement. If it were that easy, they would have
napi21
Apr 2017
#56
The worst is there is no way to stop what will be a disaster to all of us not firmly 1%ers. nt
PoliticalPie
Apr 2017
#18
If they make up for it out of the general fund like the stimulus did, I am OK with it.
Gore1FL
Apr 2017
#20
If they want an American version of Bastille Day and its aftermath then go for it.
miyazaki
Apr 2017
#23
If the level of obstruction, criminality, self-dealing and constitution-shredding they've done...
CousinIT
Apr 2017
#35
True. When it's about taking away people's MONEY, that could be the line in the sand.
CousinIT
Apr 2017
#39
Certainly if they pull that lever, Uncle Sam will have to pay back the 2.8 Trillion Dollars it
Samantha
Apr 2017
#34
Another article on this from TPM. NO WAY would HRC E V E R have considered such a thing...
CousinIT
Apr 2017
#37