Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CousinIT

(12,541 posts)
37. Another article on this from TPM. NO WAY would HRC E V E R have considered such a thing...
Tue Apr 11, 2017, 10:17 AM
Apr 2017
Social Security Advocates Sound The Alarm About The Latest Trump Tax Plan

Following reports that President Donald Trump is dumping the tax plan he campaigned on and exploring a host of other options, advocates for Social Security are sounding the alarm, pointing to a proposal to eliminate the program's primary source of funding: payroll taxes.

Though it is not yet known how far along the White House proposal has progressed, those who want to protect Social Security say they are taking the news "extremely seriously."

"Even if this is just a trial balloon, we want to puncture it as quickly as we can,” said Nancy Altman, the president of the advocacy group Social Security Works.

According to the Associated Press, lobbyists aligned with the Trump administration are pushing for the elimination of the 12.4 percent payroll tax, which is the overwhelming source of revenue for the Social Security trust funds, which provide benefits to the elderly and the disabled. The report published Monday details how they plan to sell the idea to lawmakers and the public:

This approach would give a worker earning $60,000 a year an additional $3,720 in take-home pay, a possible win that lawmakers could highlight back in their districts even though it would involve changing the funding mechanism for Social Security, according to the lobbyist, who asked for anonymity to discuss the proposal without disrupting early negotiations.

Altman, who told TPM that she only found out about this plan from press reports, called it a Trojan Horse.

"They will sell it as a tax cut for the middle class, but really this is undermining middle class economic security, and the ability to retire," she said. "They’ll say they're 'saving' Social Security, but basically they want to scale back or get rid of the program."

No other dedicated funding source has yet been floated to replace the payroll tax as a funding mechanism for Social Security, and the odds of Republicans supporting a new tax are slim.



http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/social-security-tax-program-cuts

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

RED ALERT - Republicans are threatening to DEFUND SOCIAL SECURITY!! LenaBaby61 Apr 2017 #1
Democrats running in competative races this year need to use this AGAINST their R-opponent. BlueCaliDem Apr 2017 #2
GOP trying this for 40 yrs. Diff now: Americans are woke sharedvalues Apr 2017 #3
GOP hate the populace and love the corporation. sarcasmo Apr 2017 #4
The redumbliCONs underestimate the resolve of the Senior population. democratisphere Apr 2017 #5
The DIRTBAGS are on recess now and in their local offices. If you can get there.. CousinIT Apr 2017 #6
This PearliePoo2 Apr 2017 #7
doesnt even fucking make sense. this is a middle class tax mopinko Apr 2017 #8
It is paid 50/50 by employers/employees Trekologer Apr 2017 #9
its still chump change. mopinko Apr 2017 #10
Making sense is unrelated to R policy making. Amaryllis Apr 2017 #47
file under mopinko Apr 2017 #49
there goes half of the rs base. AllaN01Bear Apr 2017 #11
K&R... spanone Apr 2017 #12
By calling it "payroll tax relief," they'll be able to deceive many Americans. klook Apr 2017 #13
They specialize in deceptive naming such as Obamacare instead of the ACA BSdetect Apr 2017 #17
Dems will have to buy ads marlakay Apr 2017 #28
AARP is all over it. I am on their emial list. THey even sent a snail mail about it today. Get the Amaryllis Apr 2017 #48
I believe the GOP is drooling for another Great Depression, so they can take us back to the C Moon Apr 2017 #14
"Capitalists will sell us the rope with which to hang them." Lenin - nt KingCharlemagne Apr 2017 #36
Every. Godamn. Day. We have to stay vigilant. nt ancianita Apr 2017 #15
They CAN'T! SS is not funded by the gov't. t's funded by witholdings from your earnings. napi21 Apr 2017 #16
The article said no more payroll SS taxes radical noodle Apr 2017 #29
They can. Mariana Apr 2017 #40
I'm sorry, but something's wrong with your statement. If it were that easy, they would have napi21 Apr 2017 #56
It has been politically impossible. Mariana Apr 2017 #57
The worst is there is no way to stop what will be a disaster to all of us not firmly 1%ers. nt PoliticalPie Apr 2017 #18
If they were uncomfortable with the ACA response, just wait. davsand Apr 2017 #19
Hi davsand. montana_hazeleyes Apr 2017 #22
Look out boys! sheshe2 Apr 2017 #26
My thoughts exactly.. whathehell Apr 2017 #30
If they make up for it out of the general fund like the stimulus did, I am OK with it. Gore1FL Apr 2017 #20
soc security should NOT be part of the general fund CousinIT Apr 2017 #21
I doubt it would be considering the source of the legislation. Gore1FL Apr 2017 #25
The general fund is vulnerable to 'pilfering', is it not? n/t sprinkleeninow Apr 2017 #32
Nope BadgerMom Apr 2017 #24
If they want an American version of Bastille Day and its aftermath then go for it. miyazaki Apr 2017 #23
Lol.. whathehell Apr 2017 #31
Exactly. NT. warmfeet Apr 2017 #51
I can't wait for them to try it radical noodle Apr 2017 #27
If the level of obstruction, criminality, self-dealing and constitution-shredding they've done... CousinIT Apr 2017 #35
Taking away their income radical noodle Apr 2017 #38
True. When it's about taking away people's MONEY, that could be the line in the sand. CousinIT Apr 2017 #39
No doubt in my mind radical noodle Apr 2017 #44
Three was a lady who was upset she voted her benefits away ... Fantastic Anarchist Apr 2017 #53
They aren't all that crazy radical noodle Apr 2017 #54
I can't recall right now, even though I read the thread yesterday. Fantastic Anarchist Apr 2017 #55
Here we go folks workinclasszero Apr 2017 #33
Certainly if they pull that lever, Uncle Sam will have to pay back the 2.8 Trillion Dollars it Samantha Apr 2017 #34
Another article on this from TPM. NO WAY would HRC E V E R have considered such a thing... CousinIT Apr 2017 #37
Per Bill Mahr Seedersandleechers Apr 2017 #41
that rtracey Apr 2017 #42
naturally, since they're planning to burn it ALL down 0rganism Apr 2017 #43
Some people raised hell when Obama cut it just a small percentage. kentuck Apr 2017 #45
Repug BS wish to stop any program that does anything at all financially for the working class. lark Apr 2017 #46
Are they hoping to exhaust our efforts opposing this IronLionZion Apr 2017 #50
Piss of seniors...They vote beachbum bob Apr 2017 #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»RED ALERT - Republicans a...»Reply #37