General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: No traction on DU for TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership)? This is a FIVE ALARM EMERGENCY, people... [View all]hay rick
(9,478 posts)"Thank you for contacting me regarding the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement between the United States and several other countries in Asia and Latin America.
I understand concerns about the transparency of the negotiation process and support greater public disclosure of trade proceedings.
If enacted, the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement will expand our access to growing markets in New Zealand, Brunei, Malaysia, Vietnam, and other countries. Even though the United States already has bilateral free trade agreements in effect with Chile, Singapore, Australia, and Peru, these agreements may be reopened within the framework of the new agreement.
Through several rounds of negotiations, the Administration has sought significant benefits for small and medium-sized businesses, such as regulatory reforms that are more compatible with practices in the United States. This will ensure that our businesses are not needlessly impeded by superfluous red tape when selling goods and services overseas..."
This garbage is clearly bipartisan.
