Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: United Airlines had nothing to do with beating the poor doctor [View all]LP2K12
(885 posts)9. Except
You can book flights for United Express via the United Airlines standard site. In addition to leasing the trademark they provide regional airlines with access to their booking system. This means that a United Express employee may have never been involved with the booking. If there were 100 seats and 100 of them booked using the United Airlines site, then United is still at fault.
Especially because United, as well as other airlines, are well known for the practice of overbooking.
Its a pretty good business model for regional airlines. Typically regional airlines get paid a fixed cost for operating certain routes, and then all the risk lies with the major carrier theyre flying on behalf of.
The reason the risk lies with United is because their Express trademark isn't just flown by one regional airline. If you book a United Express flight you could be serviced by the following: Air Wisconsin, Cape Air, CommutAir, ExpressJet, GoJet Airlines, Mesa Airlines, Republic Airline, Skywest Airlines and Trans States Airlines.
Most likely the passenger would sue both Republic and United. The overbooking issue would be the fault of United systems and practices.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think it is more likely than not that if an officer is involved in an altercation
MADem
Apr 2017
#59
I had a flight cancelled because they couldn't get the crew to D.C. on time, so they CAN do that. nt
tblue37
Apr 2017
#92
These pro-United posts are making me VERY depressed about the state of DU. I don't believe for
anneboleyn
Apr 2017
#70
He is in the hospital with a broken jaw according to CNN. That beaten enough for you?
JTFrog
Apr 2017
#36
Are you kidding? It carries United's trademark ...thus they are liable for anything done
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#22
1. Shirley Sherrod. 2. Flight was NOT overbooked. Airline made last-minute
bullwinkle428
Apr 2017
#28
HERE WE GO AGAIN WITH UNITED IS HOLY AND INNOCENT POSTS. I thought this shit ended yesterday
anneboleyn
Apr 2017
#66
Ha. You must have United stock. United had everything to do with this insanity.
sarcasmo
Apr 2017
#74
They weren't "Chicago Police" i.e. members of the CPD. They were aviation police,
pnwmom
Apr 2017
#79
Those weren't cops, they were airport security whose salaries are paid by big airlines in Chicago
geek tragedy
Apr 2017
#87