Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Johonny

(26,195 posts)
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 02:27 PM Jul 2012

are we heading towards another George Wallace state vs. federal? [View all]

Florida will not implement two provisions of the U.S. healthcare law involving an expansion of Medicaid for the poor and creation of a private insurance exchange, Governor Rick Scott said on Sunday.

Two other states with Republican governors, Wisconsin and Louisiana, opted out of the two provisions last week in the wake of the Supreme Court decision upholding the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

If states do not create insurance exchanges, the federal government says it will set up them. The exchanges are intended to extend health coverage to an additional 16 million people. The Kaiser Family Foundation says 17 states have made no significant progress toward an exchange or rejected the idea.



This isn't going to get goofy messy with Obama having to send in the national guard to protect the federal workers setting up exchanges for the states run by people like Scott, is it?
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yes no_hypocrisy Jul 2012 #1
The more thug states that refuse BumRushDaShow Jul 2012 #2
Agree. Sometimes it's better building something state-by-state. NYC_SKP Jul 2012 #3
The exchanges can be set up electronically by staffers in a office in Washington D.C. bluestateguy Jul 2012 #4
States that are challenging having their state implementing ACA are being stupid. LiberalFighter Jul 2012 #7
The feds can also set up insurance exchanges that cover abortion bluestateguy Jul 2012 #10
I just as soon that all states let the federal govt do the exchanges. LiberalFighter Jul 2012 #12
maybe he thought about it Johonny Jul 2012 #13
Not at all ProgressiveProfessor Jul 2012 #5
I think that with any state ignoring the requirement to implement state exchange LiberalFighter Jul 2012 #8
aren't they counting on that Johonny Jul 2012 #11
Except it won't effect his election because they won't see it happening until after the election. LiberalFighter Jul 2012 #14
They don't care about this election cycle Johonny Jul 2012 #16
By that time more people will be on board supporting ACA. LiberalFighter Jul 2012 #17
It seems if republican governors can basically 'nullify' a federal law Thumper79 Jul 2012 #6
Nobody is 'nullifying' any law. The law doesn't require any state to set up an exchange nor does it PoliticAverse Jul 2012 #15
Yes. ananda Jul 2012 #9
a bunch of the thug governors said the same thing about the stimulus...they ALL took it spanone Jul 2012 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»are we heading towards an...