General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why Is This Photo Deeply Offensive? [View all]Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I don't blame them, honestly. Meanwhile other members of this community were practically tripping over their own feet, rushing to one-up each other in terms of condemning in huffy, overblown language the "unacceptable" and "abusive" "hostile" image of the.....
ah, 3 smiling women on a beach.
Hell, you had some folks here making and posting lists of names of anyone who dared to even rec the damn swimsuit thread. No wonder people didn't want to stick their necks out and dare to offer a contrary opinion.
I would challenge anyone to look at the cover, again, and explain why it's any more "offensive" than the one in this thread.
Short answer, it isn't. Actually, neither is offensive. But what's extra funny is all the people protesting about how "people will get outraged over this guy but they'd be okay if it was a scantily clad woman"; not only is that bullshit- I haven't seen any outrage over this picture- but if it was the SI cover it would have been treated like a sitewide DEFCON 5 SORRY DEFCON ONE (see below) crisis.