General Discussion

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)

43. also, whose penis is actually shaped like this...

Reply to beam me up scottie (Reply #40)

Thu Apr 13, 2017, 07:26 PM

Apr 2017

Marvin the Martian's?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

72 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

MOAB--I find it beyond disgusting that penis-shaped weapons of destruction are called Mother [View all] niyad Apr 2017 OP

Totally agree, its the msm grabbing on to stupid acronyms. BSdetect Apr 2017 #1

calling bombs mother disgusts me too. delisen Apr 2017 #2

And........... guillaumeb Apr 2017 #3

The bomb was called MOAB in response to Saddam Hussein's "Mother Of All Wars" comments. TheBlackAdder Apr 2017 #4

This is DU after all LittleBlue Apr 2017 #7

I have to agree there Amishman Apr 2017 #18

I thought that came from ancient Roman times LittleBlue Apr 2017 #42

you know, people on this board are capable of having many thoughts. and the sexism niyad Apr 2017 #47

How would changing the bomb to a male name combat sexism in the military? LittleBlue Apr 2017 #66

my obsession? wow. a real stretch there. but thanks for giving me so much credit for niyad Apr 2017 #67

You posted about penises in the original thread in LBN and now here. LittleBlue Apr 2017 #69

so something was posted in two different threads. oh dear. . . how. . . niyad Apr 2017 #70

Right? It boggles our lazy minds that people can have more that one concern at any given time... LanternWaste Apr 2017 #50

Just for you, The Father of all Bombs HAB911 Apr 2017 #5

I thought that was Ishtar. n/t cloudbase Apr 2017 #25

Heaven's Gate. Orrex Apr 2017 #48

Massive Ordnance Air Burst EL34x4 Apr 2017 #6

Both have the same acronym MOAB. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2017 #22

Well, actually . . . MousePlayingDaffodil Apr 2017 #8

Would it be as effective if it were shaped like a teapot? Rollo Apr 2017 #9

SMH matt819 Apr 2017 #10

I read 1 costs $314M HAB911 Apr 2017 #13

$314 m is the cost sarisataka Apr 2017 #15

sounds more like it HAB911 Apr 2017 #17

Killing 36 people for just $444,444 a piece! Orrex Apr 2017 #55

Fair enough. Then if I am ever in direct communication with you about the GBU-43/B, petronius Apr 2017 #11

WTF? world wide wally Apr 2017 #12

"I thought that war was over a long time ago." EX500rider Apr 2017 #19

get outta here with your facts!!! Alea Apr 2017 #21

Did we remove our troops? world wide wally Apr 2017 #23

Nope...just lowered the number in country EX500rider Apr 2017 #24

Just because the anti-war movement went to sleep for 8 years former9thward Apr 2017 #46

Would Jim Morrison have called it Mother or Father? snooper2 Apr 2017 #14

Man, I love good satire. linuxman Apr 2017 #16

I love an irrational mind that is unable to process the concern of others LanternWaste Apr 2017 #51

I love your self-righteous blathering. linuxman Apr 2017 #56

interestingly, "mother of all..." is an arabic expression from the Koran. Mosby Apr 2017 #20

Exactly. I'm sure that's the origin of the name. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #33

The Con will probably be selling miniature malaise Apr 2017 #26

It's even worse than bombing the moon. n/t QC Apr 2017 #27

Russia calls their version Father of all bombs. retrowire Apr 2017 #28

What a completely stupid thing to worry about. Codeine Apr 2017 #29

I hate that a maternal name is associated with weaponry of death for any reason whatsoever. WinkyDink Apr 2017 #30

The names of the atomic bombs we used on Japan were Little Boy and Fat Man. cwydro Apr 2017 #31

It would be just as deadly if it was shaped like Hello Kitty or a piece of pizza. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #32

Never underestimate the power of the penis of doom Major Nikon Apr 2017 #34

How about a mother-shaped bomb called "Penis"? Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #35

You got the name all wrong Major Nikon Apr 2017 #37

But would they be able to bomb the moon with one that looks like Hello Kitty? beam me up scottie Apr 2017 #40

also, whose penis is actually shaped like this... Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #43

Slugs have translucent blue penises but I'm not aware of any species that sports giant green ones beam me up scottie Apr 2017 #45

K&R! nt JTFrog Apr 2017 #36

Who's are you comparing it to? Optimus Prime? Sen. Walter Sobchak Apr 2017 #38

It's getting hard to find a reason to be proud of America these days. walkingman Apr 2017 #39

Oh, FFS. MicaelS Apr 2017 #41

Are you bothered by motherboard, mother ship, or motherlode as well? MindPilot Apr 2017 #44

Or Mother Nature?? onecent Apr 2017 #54

I agree. Just another way to manipulate the way Americans view war. erinlough Apr 2017 #49

LOL Ace Rothstein Apr 2017 #52

Hm. Act_of_Reparation Apr 2017 #53

To be fair... Orrex Apr 2017 #57

vaginas are always a challenge!! niyad Apr 2017 #58

That's why Republicans legislate them more strictly than semi-automatic rifles. Orrex Apr 2017 #60

true. niyad Apr 2017 #63

I find it beyond ridiculous that the MOAB is compared to a penis shape. AtheistCrusader Apr 2017 #59

Let me tell you about my projection Orrex Apr 2017 #61

. AtheistCrusader Apr 2017 #62

you nearly owed me a keyboard!! niyad Apr 2017 #64

Right? What did that desert ever do to anyone? AtheistCrusader Apr 2017 #65

Not everything is a phallic symbol Amishman Apr 2017 #68

It's very forward thinking of our military Lordquinton Apr 2017 #71

excellent point. niyad Apr 2017 #72