Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: No traction on DU for TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership)? This is a FIVE ALARM EMERGENCY, people... [View all]The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is being negotiated in secret and the stakes for the 99% couldn't be higher. Go to www.TPP2012.com and click on TAKE ACTION today. Share Public Citizen Global Trade Watch's song parody to the tune of Jackson 5's ABC with friends and family and encourage them to take action too! Follow us @PCGTW and the hashtag #TPP2012. Together, we can STOP the TPP!
Have you heard? The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) "free trade" agreement is a stealthy policy being pressed by corporate America, a dream of the 1 percent, that in one blow could:
-offshore millions of jobs,
-free Wall Street and its banksters from oversight,
-reduce Internet freedom,
-ban policies needed to create green jobs and rebuild local economies,
-decrease access to medicine by extending drug company monopolies,
-empower corporations to attack our environmental and health safeguards, such as tobacco control and clean air and water regulations.
Closed-door talks are on-going between the U.S. and Australia, Brunei, Chile, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, Malaysia and Vietnam; with countries like Japan and China potentially joining later. 600 corporate advisors have access to the text, while the public, Members of Congress, journalists, and civil society are excluded. And so far what we know about what's in there is very scary!
But there's still time to organize to shine a light on the horrors of the TPP and convince our governments to instead pursue policies that benefit the 99% in our countries. Watch this video and then take action by signing our petition calling for an end to secrecy in the TPP negotiations and learn more at www.TPP2012.com.
--
?w=538&h=415
The Trans-Pacic Partnership (TPP) would create
a super-treaty which would jeopardize the
sovereignty of the nations involved by giving
their power to large corporations like Wal-Mart,
Monsanto, Goldman Sachs, Pzer, Halliburton,
Philip Morris, GE, GM, and Apple.
There are currently 11 nations involved: US,
New Zealand, Australia, Brunei, Chile,
Malaysia, Peru, Singapore, Vietnam, Mexico
and Canada. Japan has shown interest.
The economic power of this group is more
than 40% larger than the 27- nation
European Union.
TPP will oshore millions of good-paying
jobs to low-wage nations, undercutting
working conditions globally and
increasing unemployment.
TPP will expand pharmaceutical monopoly
protections and institute longer patents that
will decrease access to aordable medications.
TPP will limit food GMO labeling and allow the
import of goods that do not meet
US safety standards.
TPP will institute SOPA, PIPA, and CISPA-like regulations and internet measures
which restrict our right to free speech.
TPP will roll back Wall Street regulations, and prohibit bans on risky nancial services.
... unless we let them know No Deal!
-
Monday, July 2, Noon - Protest the TPP on the first day of the Talks. Join the San Diego and Imperial Counties Labor Council Rally and Press Conference at the Hilton Bayfront Hotel!
July 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 - Peoples Conference: A Better World is Possible! Evening discussions with international, national and local grassroots organizers and experts. Click for Details.
Saturday, July 7, 11 am - Major Pots and Pans March to STOP TPP! Bring Your Pots and Pans and Drums! Gather at 10:30 am in Freedom Plaza (Civic Center). March at 11 am. Rally at noon at the Hilton Bayfront Hotel!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
206 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No traction on DU for TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership)? This is a FIVE ALARM EMERGENCY, people... [View all]
HomerRamone
Jul 2012
OP
Yes, He is a third way Democrat and uses third way policy as his starting point in negotiations
Dragonfli
Jul 2012
#123
It's right up their alley, they are a corporate driven think tank after all.
Dragonfli
Jul 2012
#156
If the poster cannot, at least once, type out completely what TPP means I'll not waste my time
xtraxritical
Jul 2012
#24
The TPP "Trans-Pacific Partnership" is Gonna Further FUCK U.S. Workers. STEP UP!!!
NYC_SKP
Jul 2012
#36
I get annoyed with acronyms also, but can usually figure out WTF by reading the thread, so what's
lonestarnot
Jul 2012
#151
especially when folks like yourself throw in the towel from the get-go. and other folks are more
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#59
thank you so much for keeping the spotlight on the oligarchs and their puppets in power
stockholmer
Jul 2012
#145
You people are most welcome, but the task is to get the idiot followers to wake up.
Huey P. Long
Jul 2012
#182
thank you so much for keeping the spotlight on the oligarchs and their puppets in power
stockholmer
Jul 2012
#186
"launched ... by the George W. Bush administration". That's a red flag right there.
eppur_se_muova
Jul 2012
#18
JD, have you noticed that certain frequent posters are totally absent from this thread?
MannyGoldstein
Jul 2012
#115
Both parties are for it and the President is pushing it. Where would push back come from?
KoKo
Jul 2012
#40
China could bring a lawsuit to a group of unelected corporate lawyers called the Tribunal
Leopolds Ghost
Jul 2012
#174
How many centuries has it been this way, really? They just didn't call them corporations, is all.
freshwest
Jul 2012
#69
And according to the leak on this, they write the laws and merely distribute them
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#71
It was obvious to me, the first time I ever heard Obama speak in the Presidential primaries, that...
Larry Ogg
Jul 2012
#56
Awww come on...you didn't have time to read the article so it's the poster's fault?
KoKo
Jul 2012
#48
Traction is acquired by attracting DU-ers to the Subject. You need to help. TPP is what?
patrice
Jul 2012
#38
I did not post about this before--it's not my posts that didn't get traction
HomerRamone
Jul 2012
#43
You are correct. I suspect if a Republican was president this board would be on fire
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#49
This is primarily a "centrist" board; people here, by and large, SUPPORT unlimited free-trade.
Romulox
Jul 2012
#50
Obama Administration Expands Controversial Trade Deal (TPP) after Damaging Revelations
KoKo
Jul 2012
#53
the pro-teacher anti-uaw brigade? could you point out an example? cause i think you made it up.
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#66
I wish that I was making it up. No idea why you're leveling an angry accusation, however. nt
Romulox
Jul 2012
#76
i'm not angry. i just don't believe there's a 'brigade' of teachers who supports their own union
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#81
There's several. Quit badgering me into a call-out and search the board yourself. nt
Romulox
Jul 2012
#85
i am a strong participant in pro-teacher threads & have never seen anything like that. thus i ask
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#86
By the same token, I've never seen you speak up in favor of unionized autoworkers.
Romulox
Jul 2012
#87
I don't read even a fraction of the posts here, so I wouldn't presume to suggest someone is lying
Romulox
Jul 2012
#90
i didn't. i said you missed my posts, and linked some of them. please stop accusing me of things
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#91
You said "i think you made it up" (post #66.) I'm done with this song and dance routine. nt
Romulox
Jul 2012
#92
perhaps you could have linked evidence for your claim, as i did when you said you'd never
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#94
There's been no "lie", just sloppy accusations from you. Your hostility is mindless.
Romulox
Jul 2012
#98
i asked you to link a thread, not name names. you can't. because threads where teachers
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#100
I have one thread that sticks in my craw open right now (DU2). To link to it would be a call out in
Romulox
Jul 2012
#102
Anyhow, I'm done with you. You call me a liar in #66, and forget about it by #91.
Romulox
Jul 2012
#103
no, i said i thought you made it up. i still do, as you offer no evidence. your display of injured
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#149
Indeed. In your month and a half here you have become an absolute moral authority on this site
Romulox
Jul 2012
#193
not sure what your problem is with the word. "Adverb used to express necessity/inevitability"
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#97
You're hiding behind bluster and pretense to try to cover up your basic mistake of forgetting your
Romulox
Jul 2012
#99
i still think you made it up. you're hiding behind bluster to avoid posting evidence supporting
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#150
Check out the SUV post kicking around the front page. The love for non-union labor flows there.
Romulox
Jul 2012
#192
Check out the SUV post on the front page for all the Honda, Subaru, Hyundai (all NON UNION!)
Romulox
Jul 2012
#162
Shoot, this will likely have "minimal" impact on workers--just like NAFTA! Er, right, Manny???
Romulox
Jul 2012
#78
(Third Way?) Manny: "NAFTA caused a modest drop in the incomes low-skilled-workers". nt
Romulox
Jul 2012
#133
Manny, it was a MASSIVE gaffe by you. Your refusal to move on shows you are COMMITTED to it.
Romulox
Jul 2012
#163
Well you're third-way Manny, so of course you want to keep all of this secret.
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#152
The posts sink because we have tons of "free traders" and more that will support
TheKentuckian
Jul 2012
#84
Nadin..Check out new Nation Article: "Nafta on Steroids" (Why don't we know about it)
KoKo
Jul 2012
#165
Here's the job-transferring free-trade agreements that have been signed so far:
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#178
Here's a petition to sign "to make trade policies work for working families"...
pacalo
Jul 2012
#143
You may be right about the general absence of "traction on DU for TPP." It may be due, in part, to
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#177