General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Before the nukes fly, FUCK YOU 3RD PARTY VOTERS ALL TO HELL! [View all]Ms. Toad
(34,059 posts)and it is not fake news to say that she did
Back to the start of this thread, I am not going to apologize for pointing out the truth: Clinton is far too willing, from my perspective, to use military force to resolve conflicts. She was as a candidate, and her very recent advocacy of the use of military force in Syria confirms that she has not changed her persepective. There is nothing to apologize for. The fact that someone else is worse, or more erratic, or doesn't have a plan, or is engaging in a pissing contest with it does not make her advocacy of it acceptable.
I have no idea why you are bringing Sanders into the conversation. You seem to be under the mistaken impression that my opposition to the use of military force to resolve conflicts is dependent on who it is that is advocating it, rather than a position of conscience. As a position of conscience, I disagree with both Trump and Clinton on this matter and, to the extent Sanders is advocating militarily removing Assad, with Sanders as well.
You may not agree with my perspective on the use of military force, but to expect me to apologize for having that perspective is offensive, especially on a progressive site.