Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Before the nukes fly, FUCK YOU 3RD PARTY VOTERS ALL TO HELL! [View all]Cha
(297,205 posts)252. stein: On war, trump is safer than Clinton..
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
265 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You do recall that she advocated bombing Syria shortly before Trump actually bombed it, right? n/t
Ms. Toad
Apr 2017
#5
I think the poster is referring to a pre-emptive strike on N Korea which has nukes, but I could be..
Tarheel_Dem
Apr 2017
#6
You stated, "Advocating the military resolution of conflicts is not a position I can ever support,"
politicaljunkie41910
Apr 2017
#240
The post to which I responded was mocking people who previously expressed concerns
Ms. Toad
Apr 2017
#40
"she would need a U/N coalition to enforce the no fly zone" Why? We didn't need one in Iraq from
AtheistCrusader
Apr 2017
#184
Russia said 'stop it' in Iraq. Didn't stop us. Didn't stop Bill from continuing it.
AtheistCrusader
Apr 2017
#188
She wanted to stop them from bombing kids by taking out the air planes and fields...not
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#42
Any time we drop bombs, we also kill (or accept the possibility of death as collateral damge)
Ms. Toad
Apr 2017
#70
not likely, since Hillary advocated a strike on Syria just hours before Trump fired the missiles
virtualobserver
Apr 2017
#56
You know, a lot of the 'Hillary is a warmonger' folks, as you call them, were decent
PatrickforO
Apr 2017
#80
"The prominent Sanders backer also predicted that a Hillary Clinton indictment was "inevitable"
Cha
Apr 2017
#95
It is the third party...last time they gave us United...now they gifted us nukes...
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#43
If people were too fucking stupid to understand the stakes in this election
WomenRising2017
Apr 2017
#14
This kind of sanctimony is utterly unconvincing and has been since Nader in 2000
stevenleser
Apr 2017
#204
Nope, not when it comes to preventing lunatics from getting their hands on nukes and
stevenleser
Apr 2017
#241
Is anyone arguing otherwise... or are you simply attempting to look relevant and clever?
LanternWaste
Apr 2017
#112
People would rather blame anyone other than a candidate's responsibility to earn votes
bekkilyn
Apr 2017
#142
Wont be able to when the bombs hit and the bombs will be the fault of 3rd party
Eliot Rosewater
Apr 2017
#126
I am not sure what tuna salad has to do with not shunning potential allies in future elections
Gore1FL
Apr 2017
#121
Familiar, so if I dont kiss your ass you will vote to kill the human race...sigh
Eliot Rosewater
Apr 2017
#128
I am saying it's not a good strategy to alienate people that you need help from.
Gore1FL
Apr 2017
#148
No, you are saying if we arent nice to you , well you will just show us!
Eliot Rosewater
Apr 2017
#149
I'd prefer not to repeat those results. That's why it important to build rather than burn bridges.
Gore1FL
Apr 2017
#181
If you won't vote against a lunatic who might destroy us all because your ego isn't assuaged
stevenleser
Apr 2017
#206
So you think attacking me, despite voting for Clinton in 2016 is a good idea too?
Gore1FL
Apr 2017
#224
Deal with? How? Trump has the nukes, our chance to DEAL with this was in November.
Eliot Rosewater
Apr 2017
#129
You read one of their self serving posts...if you look at the numbers...there
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#47
Those #'s mean zilch. It is a big "IF" that 3rd party voters would have voted for HRC
vkkv
Apr 2017
#124
For every 3rd party vote in that election there were two people who decided NOT to vote
Eliot Rosewater
Apr 2017
#130
The numbers mean a little bit more than zilch, but certainly don't tell the whole story
Jim Lane
Apr 2017
#153
It won't do any good. They'll go to their radioactive graves smugly congratulating themselves
Aristus
Apr 2017
#49
Yes, and we believe we can hold people responsible for their votes and decisions
stevenleser
Apr 2017
#207
so if you buy into a lie, assuming that happened, should you be damned to hell for it? By what logic
JCanete
Apr 2017
#246
I agree Trump is the biggest asshole, but you don't win people over by insulting them.
Doodley
Apr 2017
#84
This MOAb is just the "taster" it didn't work they are laughing at dump.
The_Casual_Observer
Apr 2017
#78
Even now, there are those who coddle them, validate them and make excuses for them...
NurseJackie
Apr 2017
#106
I wont be able to watch my family grow up, because of posters in THIS THREAD
Eliot Rosewater
Apr 2017
#135
If you are a Democrat and you voted, but didn't vote for the DEMOCRATIC
democratisphere
Apr 2017
#102
There will *ALWAYS* be 3rd party voters. ALWAYS. Might as well yell at water for running down hill.
yodermon
Apr 2017
#110
I hear that there are enough suburban Republicans voters ready to change parties...
That Guy 888
Apr 2017
#220
um yeah, not in a good way. What's your point. She wasn't saying that Trump was going to be a good
JCanete
Apr 2017
#247
It's not undemocratic at all. That poster didn't say the vote should be illegal
stevenleser
Apr 2017
#209
"The prominent Sanders backer also predicted that a Hillary Clinton indictment was "inevitable"
Cha
Apr 2017
#202
The Obama Years: The Power of Words. The Smithsonian Channel has this documentary, and I cannot
still_one
Apr 2017
#176
Never mind that insanity definition. HILLARY 2020! It's time for a woman in the White House!
brewens
Apr 2017
#226
Uncalled for. People make mistakes, or just evolve how they think on things. We have
JCanete
Apr 2017
#231
I don't know what you're trying to say. There are some that didn't trust Clinton's intentions.
JCanete
Apr 2017
#244
How many times do we need to "Let it go"? How many idiots and lunatics need to be elected?
stevenleser
Apr 2017
#243
Next time will be some of the same people and some different people. It is people's right
JCanete
Apr 2017
#245
Sure it did and obviously so. Just think on it, you'll get it eventually. nt
stevenleser
Apr 2017
#264
I am sure you are right, that their feeling is allowing the worst human being alive to be
Eliot Rosewater
Apr 2017
#259