General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It would be nice if the far left, for once, did some introspection. [View all]DanTex
(20,709 posts)Calling them a "symptom" is letting them off the hook. Nobody forced Nader to run in 2000. Nobody forced Jill Stein to go around lying about the lack of differences between Hillary and Trump. And it's not just the Greens. It's the Greens and the chorus of lefty media voices repeating their talking points. You know who I mean, CounterPunch, Jacobin, some people on TYT and other youtube lefties, etc.
By calling them a "symptom", it absolves them of responsibility for their own actions. You brought up MLK a few posts ago, and that is a good point. He would have been considered "far left" by many at the time. But in addition to his political views, he was very intelligent and effective, in contrast to today's left. He didn't try to fight racism by helping even more racist people get elected. He didn't let LBJ's flaws prevent him from seeing the good that could be accomplished by working within the system.
Today's far left acts as though the Dems have free will and personal responsibility, but leftists and Greens do not. Because, let's be honest, the Green Party has been an utter failure at every level. Sure, the Dems lost last election. But before that, they held the presidency for 8 years. The Dems are an astounding success compared to the Greens or the far left.
There are countless articles about what the Dems should do to get out of their hole. Lefty media especially loves this topic. But why not articles about what the Greens and the rest of the far left need to do differently? Not one of them has the courage to say "look, running spoiler campaigns like we have for 20 years is obviously not working, let's try something different". Not one of them has the courage to say "OK, we tried to falsely claim that the Dems and the GOP are no different, and that accomplished nothing, let's stop with that stupidity."