General Discussion

sarisataka

(18,989 posts)

24. Did Kim pick up a boomer

Reply to L. Coyote (Reply #2)

Mon Apr 17, 2017, 02:42 PM

Apr 2017

Last edited Mon Apr 17, 2017, 04:01 PM - Edit history (1)

On subtrader.com? Because at last look, NK didn't have any nuclear ships let alone a missile sub.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

88 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How do they expect provoking NK to end? [View all] MGKrebs Apr 2017 OP

"Nobody knew international relations could be so complicated!" randome Apr 2017 #1

"Everyone else knew" will be the afterword. L. Coyote Apr 2017 #3

"Hillary knew" Proud Liberal Dem Apr 2017 #5

Don't forget their nuclear submarine off the California coast. L. Coyote Apr 2017 #2

I assume u r joking since they have no such thing... EX500rider Apr 2017 #17

I assume u r joking since they do have such a thing... L. Coyote Apr 2017 #20

N Korea has zero "nuclear subs"... EX500rider Apr 2017 #26

If you say so, then it must be impossible. L. Coyote Apr 2017 #36

If you have any links to N Korean "atomic subs off Calif"... EX500rider Apr 2017 #40

So, it is possible if it is linked somewhere on the internet? L. Coyote Apr 2017 #43

No, I don't think their are such links that don't lead to wacko websites. EX500rider Apr 2017 #51

Yeah lets not think about that at all, just bombs away Fuhrer Trump! workinclasszero Apr 2017 #19

Did Kim pick up a boomer sarisataka Apr 2017 #24

South Korea says NK has tested a sub-based ballistic missile LastLiberal in PalmSprings Apr 2017 #66

Yes they did. workinclasszero Apr 2017 #70

Is that sub sarisataka Apr 2017 #72

I guess D and E haven't been tested yet but in an all out war with the US I'm sure they would be workinclasszero Apr 2017 #73

Prototypes with theoretical sarisataka Apr 2017 #76

OOPS HAB911 Apr 2017 #74

See my above answer nt sarisataka Apr 2017 #77

What sub? -nt Bradical79 Apr 2017 #79

they don't even pretend to have a policy. spanone Apr 2017 #4

Trump doesn't have to do anything except stop acting like an idiot. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #6

How does playing nuclear chicken end? ananda Apr 2017 #7

Really though, don't they see that? MGKrebs Apr 2017 #8

Bush, et. ignored the part about what would happen next in Iraq Proud Liberal Dem Apr 2017 #10

Why should they care? Orrex Apr 2017 #14

How exactly would N Korea kill 50% of the S Korean population? EX500rider Apr 2017 #31

I guess it's just a paltry 14 million Orrex Apr 2017 #35

Downtown Seoul is 26 miles from the closest border point... EX500rider Apr 2017 #39

From your link: MGKrebs Apr 2017 #41

Hence S Korea going ahead with the ABM system THAAD against Chinese objections. EX500rider Apr 2017 #42

You seem intent on reassuring us that NK is not a problem. MGKrebs Apr 2017 #44

Just not a WWIII problem like many seem to think.. EX500rider Apr 2017 #47

I don't recall mentioning WWIII in my posts Orrex Apr 2017 #57

Lots of WWIII mentions in this thread, not u specifically. EX500rider Apr 2017 #59

And my point is what comes after. MGKrebs Apr 2017 #58

Apparently their has been some work in that regard: EX500rider Apr 2017 #64

No. ananda Apr 2017 #21

Shall we play a game? underpants Apr 2017 #28

You're right Proud Liberal Dem Apr 2017 #9

They want to be seen puffing up their chests maxsolomon Apr 2017 #11

I hope you are right. MGKrebs Apr 2017 #25

They expect it to end with the fall of NK Egnever Apr 2017 #12

Yeah but what does "fall of NK" mean to them? MGKrebs Apr 2017 #45

all problems to the orange menace look like the nuclear football. nt Javaman Apr 2017 #13

Billions of dollars Bayard Apr 2017 #15

"50,000 people die" workinclasszero Apr 2017 #16

I agree. Un clearly has no regard for his own people underpants Apr 2017 #29

Nearly 24 million people live in the Seoul area. panader0 Apr 2017 #34

Pence expects Jesus to show up to save him. . . no lie.. annabanana Apr 2017 #18

Geez ananda Apr 2017 #22

No, we will not "kick their butts". Our nation will be brought to its knees if he starts WWIII. NurseJackie Apr 2017 #23

I know. This would be unlikely to be a few cruise missiles and then... what? MGKrebs Apr 2017 #27

N Korea has zero chance of "bringing our nation to it's knees" EX500rider Apr 2017 #32

You're correct. That's why they call them "world" "wars"... NurseJackie Apr 2017 #46

China and Russia aren't about to commit military suicide over N Korea. EX500rider Apr 2017 #48

It will be WWIII. We will pay a heavy price. NurseJackie Apr 2017 #49

From what? EX500rider Apr 2017 #50

Well all-righty then. It's a go! Green light! Let's nuke North Korea! NurseJackie Apr 2017 #52

Who's talking about nuking N Korea? EX500rider Apr 2017 #54

So why wait? Let's start a war! The sooner the better! Woo-hoo! Fun! NurseJackie Apr 2017 #56

Fuck yeah! USA USA USA!!! workinclasszero Apr 2017 #71

there's zero thought or planning in this. they operate on instinct. nk misbehaves, we get tough. unblock Apr 2017 #30

+1 MGKrebs Apr 2017 #62

The Acronym MIHOP comes to mind n/t n2doc Apr 2017 #33

North Korea is capable of launching an EMP attack over the USA. mackdaddy Apr 2017 #37

They might have that capability in the next 10 years or so....if we let them.. EX500rider Apr 2017 #53

I hope you are right, but they have the working components now. mackdaddy Apr 2017 #61

They want China to freak out over the possibility of a nuclear war on their doorstep Calista241 Apr 2017 #38

Here's how it ends. roamer65 Apr 2017 #55

What do you think US policy should be with respect to NK? oberliner Apr 2017 #60

I think the goal is to keep people from getting killed. MGKrebs Apr 2017 #67

If we go to full-out war with North Korea, more than 50,000 people will die. That's the problem. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #63

What makes yoy think "we" are going to "kick their butts"? Our military has not won a single KingCharlemagne Apr 2017 #65

Exactly! What does "winning" actually mean? MGKrebs Apr 2017 #68

What conflict did US forces lose? EX500rider Apr 2017 #69

Straw man. MGKrebs Apr 2017 #78

Well the opposite of won is generally lost.. EX500rider Apr 2017 #81

Ah, good. This is exactly the discussion I was looking for. MGKrebs Apr 2017 #83

Oh I expect China would install a puppet government.. EX500rider Apr 2017 #84

Well to me every day you are not dropping bombs and MGKrebs Apr 2017 #86

When you fail in your stated objective you lose -nt Bradical79 Apr 2017 #80

see post #81 EX500rider Apr 2017 #82

And when did that happen? EX500rider Apr 2017 #88

The more common term for the potential fate of the South Korean capital, HAB911 Apr 2017 #75

[Insert Joker meme about looking like a guy with a plan.] Orsino Apr 2017 #85

war. republicans LOVE it. it allows them to destroy government while the people remain patriotic spanone Apr 2017 #87