Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(169,506 posts)
27. The author of the piece cannot seem to let it go
Mon Apr 17, 2017, 02:53 PM
Apr 2017

by asserting that -

Just a year ago the Democratic establishment was recklessly (and disingenuously) maligning the policy to help keep Sen. Bernie Sanders from winning the Democratic Primary.


What you are arguing is not what the author is arguing. The author is basically saying the party itself does not want single-payer and that any critiques of Sen. Sander's version of such a plan were not only not welcome, but were somehow the source of his loss in primaries that happened over a year ago....and this is pure bullshit.

The issue is that, just like we saw with the ridiculous AHCA put forth by the GOP, there are often major technicalities that arise and need to be fleshed out when one proffers an initial legislative "plan" like this, such as what had been done by Clinton (in the '90s), Obama (in the late '00s), and Sanders (last year), and those issues need to be addressed and worked out congenially and realistically, without the continual finger-pointing and childish infighting.

One of the things rarely cited about Obama, even before he became a U.S. Senator or the President, was that as a State Senator, the type of legislation that he most focused on had to do with healthcare (from here) -



So you can see the desire was DEFINITELY there for "universal" or "single-payer", but the devil will ALWAYS be in the details.

Even as the idiot Drumpf discovered and blurted out- "nobody knew health care could be so complicated", so to do we need to acknowledge this without the hyperbolic primary crap. The irony is that far too many within the party ran away from the ACA in 2010 during that year's elections, yet as we are now seeing 7 years later, the "something" that we got was definitely better than nothing because that "something" can now form the foundation and be the basis to transition to what we really want.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We need this! get the red out Apr 2017 #1
And well this should be American's biggest concern. rgbecker Apr 2017 #2
I don't think too many of us were happy that the Public Option was killed, Volaris Apr 2017 #3
I agree completely ...the ACA passing was a amazing...and while Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #9
There is a Frontline episode called, "Obama's Deal" LeftInTX Apr 2017 #26
Single payer insurance is just common sense. Eyeball_Kid Apr 2017 #4
More Democratic Party bashing from a source I never heard of. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #5
I Think Some Don't Sign On. . . ProfessorGAC Apr 2017 #7
The main reason they're against single payer FakeNoose Apr 2017 #19
They who? Republicans...no doubt. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #22
The GOP is the only group against single payer, am I right? FakeNoose Apr 2017 #23
Just over a year again some Democrats opposed it as being totally unfeasible Tom Rinaldo Apr 2017 #25
Different agenda FakeNoose Apr 2017 #30
I don't know anyone who is against single payer...the argument is ...can we do it now ? Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #32
Dianne Feinstein is against it as of this week. PatsFan87 Apr 2017 #34
Yeah, That's Fair ProfessorGAC Apr 2017 #29
The ACA has built up a constituency of supporters IronLionZion Apr 2017 #6
There may also be hidden corporate support for single payer- delisen Apr 2017 #12
The car companies have endorsed single payer IronLionZion Apr 2017 #13
The companies that are unionised like it because Exilednight Apr 2017 #18
I think these are the companies with which we can make common cause delisen Apr 2017 #20
That makes sense! Kimchijeon Apr 2017 #17
Unrec BumRushDaShow Apr 2017 #8
this + 1 nt JTFrog Apr 2017 #11
++++ JHan Apr 2017 #15
I agree the tone can be called divisive. Tom Rinaldo Apr 2017 #21
The author of the piece cannot seem to let it go BumRushDaShow Apr 2017 #27
Can't take shit like this seriously when the divisive bullshit is thrown in there. JTFrog Apr 2017 #10
Thank you for saying what I was thinking. NurseJackie Apr 2017 #16
And just think prior to having another "recess" courteous of one Paul "Ayn Rand" Ryan or has he is turbinetree Apr 2017 #14
Where can I find a list of the sponsors? nt LAS14 Apr 2017 #24
Here BumRushDaShow Apr 2017 #28
How did the "Democratic Establishment" malign the policy? brooklynite Apr 2017 #31
The Democratic establishment leads the political party Progressive dog Apr 2017 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Single-Payer Health Care ...»Reply #27