Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Clinton: 'That was my last race' [View all]ehrnst
(32,640 posts)61. It does and has affected the presidential election
In 2012, President Obama won Virginia with just over 51 percent of the vote. But under the Republican-proposed system of allocating votes, Obama would have received just four electoral votes while Mitt Romney would have received nine. Raise your hand if that sounds right.
President Obama won Pennsylvania by 5.2 percent under the original plan proposed in Pennsylvania that would have meant 13 electoral votes for Romney and seven for Obama
There are other states where Republicans control both chambers and the governorship where this kind of bill could move forward. If Wisconsin had adopted the Virginia plan, Romney would have won 7 electoral votes and Obama would have taken only 3 electoral votes despite the fact that Obama won by 7percent of the statewide popular vote. In Florida, where Obama won 50percent - 49percent, the electoral vote allocation would have been Romney 18, Obama 11. Put simply - this doesnt pass the sniff test. As Ari Berman pointed out for The Nation, if Florida, Michigan, Ohio, Virginia, Florida, and Pennsylvania had all adopted this vote-splitting plan for the 2012 election, Romney would have garnered 270 electoral votes and won the presidency.
President Obama won Pennsylvania by 5.2 percent under the original plan proposed in Pennsylvania that would have meant 13 electoral votes for Romney and seven for Obama
There are other states where Republicans control both chambers and the governorship where this kind of bill could move forward. If Wisconsin had adopted the Virginia plan, Romney would have won 7 electoral votes and Obama would have taken only 3 electoral votes despite the fact that Obama won by 7percent of the statewide popular vote. In Florida, where Obama won 50percent - 49percent, the electoral vote allocation would have been Romney 18, Obama 11. Put simply - this doesnt pass the sniff test. As Ari Berman pointed out for The Nation, if Florida, Michigan, Ohio, Virginia, Florida, and Pennsylvania had all adopted this vote-splitting plan for the 2012 election, Romney would have garnered 270 electoral votes and won the presidency.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joan-fitzgerald/electoral-college-gerrymandering_b_2552584.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
She will continue to be a strong voice for human rights, especially those of women and children.
Arkansas Granny
Apr 2017
#2
I did. "Yet he is getting pilloried by some people for not doing it." :) nt.
NCTraveler
Apr 2017
#50
re: "It was a clear to me who is a Democrat and who might just use Democrats."
thesquanderer
Apr 2017
#34
I wouldn't put too much weight on something she said in the heat of the moment.
Bleacher Creature
Apr 2017
#14
I was looking for him to speak at one of the "show your tax returns" demonstrations
ehrnst
Apr 2017
#52
We have entered a dark period for Progressives, which we know will probably get worse.
MainSt99
Apr 2017
#63
It is a disgrace how Hillary was treated, especially by the press. This was a circus to them.
still_one
Apr 2017
#30
She'll be treated very well when the history of this stolen election is written.
ehrnst
Apr 2017
#55