Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Livonia doctor's defense denies female genital mutilation; calls it religious removal [View all]jberryhill
(62,444 posts)72. Which is why Christians in those same countries ALSO do it
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Livonia doctor's defense denies female genital mutilation; calls it religious removal [View all]
FrodosNewPet
Apr 2017
OP
You mean "some" men demand it just some clearly there are "some" women who are ok with
cstanleytech
Apr 2017
#14
sad thing is the right wing will use this to spread more Muslim hatred even though
luvMIdog
Apr 2017
#9
I lived in the middle east for many years this is not common among the majority
luvMIdog
Apr 2017
#35
Given that there are Muslim majority countries in which this practice does not exist...
jberryhill
Apr 2017
#59
I almost want to have them sterilized however once you go down that road its hard to find
cstanleytech
Apr 2017
#15
Objection, your honor: In the absence of a foreskin, Muh Dick serves no purpose!
Act_of_Reparation
Apr 2017
#55
I think it's from Frank Herbert - an early "Dune" manuscript used "Muh Dick" instead of "Muad Dib"
hatrack
Apr 2017
#56
Male circumcision is a form of mutilation, but nothing compares to the atrocity of female...
Equinox Moon
Apr 2017
#25