Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Michigan doctor says female genital surgery was a 'religious practice' -- not mutilation [View all]csziggy
(34,189 posts)32. Health reasons would eliminate the traditional method of circumcision
NYC to automatically ban mohels linked to newborn herpes cases
March 31, 2017 7:07am
(JTA) The New York City Health Department said it will ban ritual circumcisers automatically if the infant they treated orally develops a herpes infection.
The ban would affect those who perform the ritual known as metzitzah bpeh, in which the person performing the circumcision, known as a mohel, sucks blood from the wound following circumcision. It is a common practice among many haredi Orthodox Jews. When performed directly with the mouth as opposed to through a sterile pipette, it has been linked directly to the transmission of the herpes virus.
Under the new regulation, every time there is a mohel who performed metzitzah bpeh on an infant who has contracted HSV-1, the Health Department will serve them with Commissioners orders banning them from performing the ritual, The Jewish Week of New York reported Thursday, quoting city officials. HSV-1 is a type of herpes.
The Health Department will now ban the mohels linked to cases of herpes in newborns without testing for the virus, the newspaper reported. Prior to the regulation, the ban would be issued only pending tests both of the mohel and the baby.
http://www.jta.org/2017/03/31/news-opinion/united-states/nyc-to-automatically-ban-mohels-if-children-they-treated-orally-get-herpes
March 31, 2017 7:07am
(JTA) The New York City Health Department said it will ban ritual circumcisers automatically if the infant they treated orally develops a herpes infection.
The ban would affect those who perform the ritual known as metzitzah bpeh, in which the person performing the circumcision, known as a mohel, sucks blood from the wound following circumcision. It is a common practice among many haredi Orthodox Jews. When performed directly with the mouth as opposed to through a sterile pipette, it has been linked directly to the transmission of the herpes virus.
Under the new regulation, every time there is a mohel who performed metzitzah bpeh on an infant who has contracted HSV-1, the Health Department will serve them with Commissioners orders banning them from performing the ritual, The Jewish Week of New York reported Thursday, quoting city officials. HSV-1 is a type of herpes.
The Health Department will now ban the mohels linked to cases of herpes in newborns without testing for the virus, the newspaper reported. Prior to the regulation, the ban would be issued only pending tests both of the mohel and the baby.
http://www.jta.org/2017/03/31/news-opinion/united-states/nyc-to-automatically-ban-mohels-if-children-they-treated-orally-get-herpes
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Michigan doctor says female genital surgery was a 'religious practice' -- not mutilation [View all]
DonViejo
Apr 2017
OP
I'm assuming it is the "excess" labial tissue that many women have around their vaginas...
Wounded Bear
Apr 2017
#4
I'm surprised more religions haven't declared the human head "excess unnecessary tissue"
Warren DeMontague
Apr 2017
#23
Sounds awful, but I doubt even you would say it's equal to being mutilated as a child
whathehell
Apr 2017
#24
And the Catholic Church would let you die from an ectopic pregnancy rather than
50 Shades Of Blue
Apr 2017
#28
I wonder how many of the women condemned by the Catholic Church to die excrutiating, unnecessary
50 Shades Of Blue
Apr 2017
#45
Right! Some choice, huh? Have a lifesaving abortion, or get an express ticket to hell.
50 Shades Of Blue
Apr 2017
#51
I don't think anyone here agrees with the RCC on reproductive choice or the lack thereof.
Warren DeMontague
Apr 2017
#48
This subject is too important and the abuse is too widespread not to point out the similarities.
50 Shades Of Blue
Apr 2017
#54
that isn't necessarily my position, but this isn't the place to debate it.
Warren DeMontague
Apr 2017
#71
Female genital mutilation is the equivalent of loping off the penis altogether.
RandySF
Apr 2017
#55
Gosh. Cruelty in the name of religion. Who could have imagined such a thing? n/t
Binkie The Clown
Apr 2017
#29
whats funny is all manner of oppressive, theocratic bullshit would be okay
Warren DeMontague
Apr 2017
#64