Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
43. So you admit he is correct when he claims the US is attempting to prosecute him.
Tue Jul 3, 2012, 12:09 AM
Jul 2012

And what would the charges be against a journalist who simply published facts, together with the NY Times, La Monde, The Guardian and many other publications who published the same material? Will they be prosecuted also?

And yes, elected officials here HAVE called his death. Where have you been?

Sarah Palin former candidate for VP of the US eg. And not one member of this government denounced her. That silence has been taken overseas, as consent.

Joe Lieberman has called for him, AND the NYT, The Guardian and any other publication that published the material obtained perfectly legitimately by a journalist from a whistle-blower, to be tried under the Espionage Act. Do you think the NYT are guilty of spying?

I agree regarding the 'drama' aspect, but I am not the drama queen here, it appears to be the US Government, freaking over a journalist doing his job.

The vile and way outdated Espionage Act WAS challenged and defeated in a case very similar to this, when thankfully, the US was not so far gone to the Right and the SC had not yet been hi-jacked by Corporations, and people like Joe Lieberman calling for the Press to be tried for treason, were viewed for what they were, insane.

The SC stopped the US Govt from silencing the NY Times in the Ellsberg case and restored their rights as journalists, concluding that the public's right to know superceded the government's desire for secrecy.

I'm not sure today's right wing court would be willing to defend and protect the Constitution as the court did back then, but that was a very close call when the 1st Amendment was in serious jeopardy.

And Ellsberg's case, which he himself has stated many times, was almost identical to Assange's. But that was then, this is now and I see democrats supporting this despite the huge threat to the freedom of the press. It is shameful, frankly, and then you accuse me of not being loyal to the US. Anyone who would do such damage to the constitution are who you should aim your criticisms at. I am defending what makes this country something to be proud of.

I am awed by the work of the FFs and saddened by those who would destroy it.

"..because our country is a peaceful territory committed to justice and truth” Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2012 #1
So true. :( IcyMint Jul 2012 #24
Some info treestar Jul 2012 #2
I guess you know that any report on human rights by the US State Dept. on other sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #4
I knew someone would do that treestar Jul 2012 #5
The US still operates through its rightwing contacts sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #6
Ecuador is not a good place to hold up as the pinnacle of human rights treestar Jul 2012 #8
Actually most Latin American countries, now struggling to overcome their sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #10
However, looking at the Amnesty report, we learn treestar Jul 2012 #11
The US is much better? girl gone mad Jul 2012 #12
Indeed. Routine torture in prisons, massive numbers imprisoned, prosecution of whistleblowers, Luminous Animal Jul 2012 #14
Nothing like described in my prior post treestar Jul 2012 #18
Protesters in the US have been arrested for going to a Bush rally wearing sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #23
Joe Wilson could have been arrested in Ecuador treestar Jul 2012 #29
You're working hard to discredit a country which under the current president sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #31
There is power to arrest people who insult the President there treestar Jul 2012 #35
Ecuador's laws re libel and slander are similar to those in the UK. sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #39
Nobody has called for his death treestar Jul 2012 #40
So you admit he is correct when he claims the US is attempting to prosecute him. sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #43
UN Secretary General, Ban commends Ecuador’s efforts on democracy, human rights, environment sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #15
Amnesty is Wrong? treestar Jul 2012 #19
They are not infallible. sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #22
But the US government is completely fallible treestar Jul 2012 #28
You said that, not I. sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #30
Huh? Have you ever admitted this country ever did anything right? treestar Jul 2012 #36
Yes, many times, all the time. What this country did right sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #37
Meant to add, and ask, who are these police? The US funded ones sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #17
The US is at fault? treestar Jul 2012 #20
No, he has the power, as does any leader of a Democratic nation, to hold accountable sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #21
The POTUS does not have any such power treestar Jul 2012 #27
Occupy fared well in the US?? Are you serious? In a coordinated sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #32
I am merely telling you what the state department and Amnesty observed treestar Jul 2012 #34
Sigh, the 'Nato Three' still in jail, accused of terrorism sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #38
If that is true and not exaggeration treestar Jul 2012 #41
No link, so I don't know where you got that. sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #42
+1 nt MADem Jul 2012 #25
This is a great interview Assange did with Correa sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #3
Thanks for adding the link, sabrina. I've watched all of Assange's shows. Luminous Animal Jul 2012 #7
Interesting link. freshwest Jul 2012 #9
Feinstein renews calls for Assange to be prosecuted for espionage. Luminous Animal Jul 2012 #13
It's a disgrace, really. Elected of officials, especially democrats, sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #16
+1 KoKo Jul 2012 #33
Du rec. Nt xchrom Jul 2012 #26
DU rec and a link you will probably find interesting: inna Jul 2012 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»President Correa on Assan...»Reply #43