Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)WAPO: Bernie Sanders's strange behavior [View all]
Perhaps the strangest thing about this is that Sanders isn't vouching for Ossoff's progressivism even as he's doing so for another Democrat of pretty questionable credentials. That would be Omaha mayoral candidate and former state senator Heath Mello, whom Sanders will campaign with Thursday.
As the Wall Street Journal's Reid J. Epstein and Natalie Andrews note, Mello in 2009 sponsored a bill that would require a woman to look at ultrasound images of her fetus before undergoing an abortion (he still opposes abortion rights). Indeed, it's tough to think of something that progressives would hate more.
..................................................
Yet Sanders defends his endorsement of Mello whom he somewhat curiously refers to as this fellow" (?) by noting the terrain on which Democrats are trying to win.
If this fellow wins in Nebraska, that would be a shot across the board, that in a state like Nebraska a progressive Democrat can win, that will give hope to folks in other conservative states that perhaps they can win as well, Sanders said.
That entire justification could just as easily be applied to Ossoff, though. He is, after all, running in a district that Republicans have routinely won with more than 60 percent of the vote. Omaha is in Nebraska, yes, but President Obama won its congressional district and an electoral vote there in 2008, and a Mello victory would hardly be the boost that Ossoff's would be.
As the Wall Street Journal's Reid J. Epstein and Natalie Andrews note, Mello in 2009 sponsored a bill that would require a woman to look at ultrasound images of her fetus before undergoing an abortion (he still opposes abortion rights). Indeed, it's tough to think of something that progressives would hate more.
..................................................
Yet Sanders defends his endorsement of Mello whom he somewhat curiously refers to as this fellow" (?) by noting the terrain on which Democrats are trying to win.
If this fellow wins in Nebraska, that would be a shot across the board, that in a state like Nebraska a progressive Democrat can win, that will give hope to folks in other conservative states that perhaps they can win as well, Sanders said.
That entire justification could just as easily be applied to Ossoff, though. He is, after all, running in a district that Republicans have routinely won with more than 60 percent of the vote. Omaha is in Nebraska, yes, but President Obama won its congressional district and an electoral vote there in 2008, and a Mello victory would hardly be the boost that Ossoff's would be.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/04/20/bernie-sanderss-strange-behavior/?utm_term=.e804922b8cd4
189 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders is head of Democratic Party Outreach. He's supposed to be working for the Democratic party.
KittyWampus
Apr 2017
#6
There are certainly "fools" here, but it's not the readers of Wapo. And as for "taking your crap....
Tarheel_Dem
Apr 2017
#130
Raising the cost for abortion providers is one way to obstruct low income women from having access
ehrnst
Apr 2017
#12
. He has stated that "economic issues" are what determines if a candidate is "progressive or not."
Cha
Apr 2017
#20
What I posted is positive enough without coming across as any kind of endorsement...
KittyWampus
Apr 2017
#13
Warren hasn't stated that she determines who is "progressive" and who is "maybe not."
ehrnst
Apr 2017
#18
lol your continued attempt to mix Presidential strategy with they dynamics of this district is
grantcart
Apr 2017
#131
To say that it's all about turnout and then only speak to Democratic turnout
grantcart
Apr 2017
#151
Sanders didn't need to make a strongly positive comment. He could have made a generic
KittyWampus
Apr 2017
#94
All I am saying is that it seems unneccessary to be critical of Bernie over this.
MGKrebs
Apr 2017
#70
Anyone who dismisses women's reproductive health care and childbearing as a "social issue"
ehrnst
Apr 2017
#11
Doesn't explain why Bernie stated that "he didn't know if Ossoff was progressive." (nt)
ehrnst
Apr 2017
#15
More like screw the candidate that didn't support me in the primary or that is backed by John Lewis.
JTFrog
Apr 2017
#22
But as a "leader" of the Democratic Party shouldn't he have bothered to find out a little bit...
George II
Apr 2017
#46
that is 100 percent speculation of motives without any actual proof, fed only by your own
JCanete
Apr 2017
#158
Have you read some of Sanders statements he said in the past in regards to race?
uponit7771
Apr 2017
#181
Democrats "get over" civil rights and public health issues being relegated to the back of the bus?
ehrnst
Apr 2017
#48
So you favor the the GOP candidate? There are only 2 candidates for that election.
That Guy 888
Apr 2017
#123
4 of the five justices were Democratic appointees and the 5th only happened because Democrats
dsc
Apr 2017
#127
we actually had a better batting average with our nominees than they did with theirs
dsc
Apr 2017
#139
How can they? It's pretty clear that outside forces are trying to use Sanders as a wedge...
KittyWampus
Apr 2017
#101
People all over this site say that all that matters is the D after their names.
alarimer
Apr 2017
#54
Why would he endorse Mello and not Ossoff, a progressive? And claim not to know
pnwmom
Apr 2017
#113
Having a majority with a D after their names is what gives a party control over leadership.
pnwmom
Apr 2017
#154
A Russian agent? I think thats a bit to much into the twilight zone for me to believe to be honest
cstanleytech
Apr 2017
#149
But when you point things out its back to your bashing him , etc...wake up to REALITY
Historic NY
Apr 2017
#87
That article was mislabeled. Sanders is the most popular member of Congress for Vermonters.
KittyWampus
Apr 2017
#95
It's so confusing. Sanders is bad because he isn't a Democrat. Mello is bad but he is a Democrat.
Nanjeanne
Apr 2017
#110
As is Manchin. As is Casey. As is Donnelly. As is Lipinski and Peterson in House. I don't
Nanjeanne
Apr 2017
#145
Well that's fine. Sanders obviously feels differently. Maybe he was asked to do this. Maybe
Nanjeanne
Apr 2017
#152
Well I guess Democrats think differently than you. DCCC is making an investment to back Quist
Nanjeanne
Apr 2017
#177