Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
38. I think we agree about how risky it is. I'm not at all convinced we'll win that fight, but its
Thu Apr 20, 2017, 09:27 PM
Apr 2017

easier for me to consider because I don't think we're winning it now. I think as much as we try to be the adults in the room, telling corporate heads and rich people, "look, lets be responsible here and not incite pitch-forks. Come to the table with us and lets work something out, " the money keeps going..."sure, here's some money because we prefer you to anything close to a socialist, and trust us, we'll totally work with you--when we have to--after our first pick loses and our other options are exhausted." And then they sick their media on the democrats anyway, and do what they can to make sure we do lose, or are so bloodied and maligned that we cant' get them to work with us when we're in office.

I think we need to scare the shit out of them and their GOP lackeys with what would be considered "extreme" legislation, just so that they cave to compromise the way our party-members are often told they need to do, for fear of something more drastic. Its obviously a different game. The media will sell the GOP narrative and trash a liberal narrative. But social media is here, and we can use it, and we can disavow corporate media too, and should. The GOP has already done that work...I say we judo it and say "that's right, corporately owned media can't be trusted," but for entirely different reasons. I mean, it will come with the territory. As soon as we step over that line in uncompromising terms, the knives will be out in the media even more viciously than they typically are. But the point is those knives are out now.

The media spin should absolutely be in question when people watch or listen to it, but it has to be viewed through an entirely different lens than what it is currently, and we have the basic evidence to back it up. Why would huge corporations be anti corporation? Why would they be trying to sell higher taxes for the wealthy? Why would they be trying to sell draconian and "fake" environmental policies? The logic is so flawed on its surface, but the media perpetuates itself as "liberal" because that is effective, and we don't challenge it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R! stonecutter357 Apr 2017 #1
HA Goodman!!! NCTraveler Apr 2017 #2
Isn't Ross Perot still alive? L. Coyote Apr 2017 #3
Lie-berman? No. Lint Head Apr 2017 #4
anyone who is undecided after this election, WomenRising2017 Apr 2017 #5
This is the reason I quit listening to Hartmann years ago. He was always telling independents & Tarheel_Dem Apr 2017 #6
What an odd description of Independents you offered. democrank Apr 2017 #7
lol WomenRising2017 Apr 2017 #18
I need to choose a side? democrank Apr 2017 #20
I voted a straight Democratic... tonedevil Apr 2017 #22
hear that, little woman? Skittles Apr 2017 #25
lol WomenRising2017 Apr 2017 #36
I guess we know different kinds of independents. DanTex Apr 2017 #24
What causes you to think that was the reason the 100 Democratic seats were lost? delisen Apr 2017 #27
Corruption in either party needs to be fought ProfessorPlum Apr 2017 #8
Sure, but right now corruption lives overwhelmingly in one party and not the other. DanTex Apr 2017 #9
Is it just me or are most Independents older white dudes? nt LexVegas Apr 2017 #10
And young white dudes too. nt DanTex Apr 2017 #11
Yes. White dudes. nt LexVegas Apr 2017 #12
Let's you and them fight! klook Apr 2017 #13
Very good points. The funny thing is that in Connecticut there are no "independents".... George II Apr 2017 #14
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2017 #15
Lol. nt JTFrog Apr 2017 #21
I have found this... tonedevil Apr 2017 #23
lieberman..... KentuckyWoman Apr 2017 #16
As if The DOOR hasn't always been OPEN to INDEPENDENTS Cha Apr 2017 #17
Most of them were Russians tallahasseedem Apr 2017 #19
A Pew research chart (sorry no link) panader0 Apr 2017 #26
Independents, by and large, are more conservative than Democrats. DanTex Apr 2017 #28
My problem with centrists is that the center keeps moving further to the right. panader0 Apr 2017 #30
Well, sanders thinks we can move to the left when it comes to a class-war and that that will JCanete Apr 2017 #32
OK, and that's a reasonable argument. I might not agree, but it's defensible. DanTex Apr 2017 #37
I think we agree about how risky it is. I'm not at all convinced we'll win that fight, but its JCanete Apr 2017 #38
I think Sanders should be careful about how he promotes being an independent. JCanete Apr 2017 #29
Awesome OP! JustAnotherGen Apr 2017 #31
FWIW...Peronally, I simply have no desire to "belong" to any group... MedusaX Apr 2017 #33
I have an idea... kentuck Apr 2017 #34
The Democratic Party should be controlled by Democrats and not indies Gothmog Apr 2017 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Let's get us some Indepen...»Reply #38