Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

The99thTimeLord

(88 posts)
Fri Apr 21, 2017, 12:57 PM Apr 2017

I'm not sure we didn't put an innocent man to death last night. [View all]

I read in another article he asked for a DNA test to match against DNA at the scene but it wasn't granted.

I heard Ledell professed and proclaimed his innocense from beginning to end and his last meal was "the Holy Communion".

My smell test tells me Ledell is acting the way an innocent person acts in the face of injustice. Oppose it to the very end.



http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/21/us/arkansas-ledell-lee-execution/index.html




Edited: Yep found it, here's from an article about the DNA.

"LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (KTHV) - A Pulaski County Circuit Court judge has denied a motion set forth by the ACLU, which asked for new DNA testing for Ledell Lee's case.

The ACLU cited two reasons for the motion to stay Lee's execution. The first reason was that advances in DNA testing allowed for new testing in his case. The second reason given by the ACLU was that he has an intellectual disability due to fetal alcohol syndrome and his "horrible legal counsel" did not present that in his original trial.

They argued that new testing would prove that the hair found at the scene did not belong to Lee and that blood on his shoe was not from the victim, Debra Reese. Lee was convicted for the 1993 murder of Reese.

In his ruling, Judge Herbert Wright said that improvements to DNA testing "has been available for some years prior" and questioned the delay in the filing by the ACLU."
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's outrageous when they refuse to do DNA tests. Vinca Apr 2017 #1
why deny anyone we are going to kill a DNA test? spanone Apr 2017 #2
Amen! Delphinus Apr 2017 #7
Why would a DNA test be denied? CrispyQ Apr 2017 #3
In the ruling, the judge said that even if the DNA didn't match.... NCTraveler Apr 2017 #11
Because atreides1 Apr 2017 #12
The biggest reason I'm against the death penalty Phoenix61 Apr 2017 #4
Happens often. elleng Apr 2017 #5
I heard Delphinus Apr 2017 #6
His last meal being "the Holy Communion" has little to do with anything. NCTraveler Apr 2017 #8
It means something to me. The99thTimeLord Apr 2017 #10
" If I was a murderer I'd go out with a steak. " NCTraveler Apr 2017 #13
But he wasn't put on death row for that. The99thTimeLord Apr 2017 #14
"But he wasn't put on death row for that." NCTraveler Apr 2017 #15
Then I'm confused about the relevance of you bringing this up. The99thTimeLord Apr 2017 #16
I was simply highlighting why is make no sense that you would compare yourself to him. NCTraveler Apr 2017 #17
Well that's my point. The comparison is to say he may have not done it. I've never killed anybody. The99thTimeLord Apr 2017 #18
Gee, I wonder if he was black? Eliot Rosewater Apr 2017 #9
From pictures 4 of the 8 Arkansas is trying to murder mythology Apr 2017 #19
One of many reasons to be against the DP Warpy Apr 2017 #20
In order to find out when we got something wrong, The99thTimeLord Apr 2017 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'm not sure we didn't pu...