Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Robert's "long game" is to dismantle affirmative action [View all]Enrique
(27,461 posts)47. that is RW disinformation
I hate to see it spread at DU, but at least it gives the opportunity to set the record straight.
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1292
(...)
The exploitation of King's name, the distortion of his teachings for political gain, is an ugly development. The term "affirmative action" did not come into currency until after King's death--but it was King himself, as chair of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, who initiated the first successful national affirmative action campaign: "Operation Breadbasket."
In Atlanta, Philadelphia, Chicago and other cities, King staffers gathered data on the hiring patterns of corporations doing business in black communities, and called on companies to rectify disparities. "At present, SCLC has Operation Breadbasket functioning in some 12 cities, and the results have been remarkable," King wrote (quoted in Testament of Hope, James Washington, ed.), boasting of "800 new and upgraded jobs [and] several covenants with major industries."
King was well aware of the arguments used against affirmative action policies. As far back as 1964, he was writing in Why We Can't Wait: "Whenever the issue of compensatory treatment for the Negro is raised, some of our friends recoil in horror. The Negro should be granted equality, they agree; but he should ask nothing more. On the surface, this appears reasonable, but it is not realistic."
King supported affirmative action-type programs because he never confused the dream with American reality. As he put it, "A society that has done something special against the Negro for hundreds of years must now do something special for the Negro" to compete on a just and equal basis (quoted in Let the Trumpet Sound, by Stephen Oates).
In a 1965 Playboy interview, King compared affirmative action-style policies to the GI Bill: "Within common law we have ample precedents for special compensatory programs.... And you will remember that America adopted a policy of special treatment for her millions of veterans after the war."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I am reading how some Labor historians think AA split the economic working class that used to
patrice
Jul 2012
#2
The abuse of authentic meritocracy is part of what HAS enslaved ALL of us. I'm old,
patrice
Jul 2012
#5
Workers need their own in-situ collectively developed job-specific evergreen merit assessment proces
patrice
Jul 2012
#6
Cowie says all of that was the end of the New Deal Coalition & the beginning of the Southern Strateg
patrice
Jul 2012
#7
i would like to meet some of these unqualified minority students who fail because of AA
EFerrari
Jul 2012
#18
There were any number of them in most of the big name schools, including Cal
ProgressiveProfessor
Jul 2012
#19
Please note that the Punahou graduate with less than stellar grades
ProgressiveProfessor
Jul 2012
#22
And your were probably better prepared for college than many other schools
ProgressiveProfessor
Jul 2012
#39
Lack of adequate preparation in high school is not the same as lack of adequate preparation by race.
Gormy Cuss
Jul 2012
#23
No it doesn't, thats false...AA has nothing to do with quotas and that's what you're pushing logical
uponit7771
Jul 2012
#44
To me it's not about "unqualified students" (everyone is qualified in a different way, imo).
Romulox
Jul 2012
#28
Clearly not everyone is qualified, especially at high end universities
ProgressiveProfessor
Jul 2012
#34
American Universities don't even BEGIN to teach the skills necessary for life in the 21st century.
Romulox
Jul 2012
#40
That has nothing to do with AA, that has more to do with racist memes than anything
uponit7771
Jul 2012
#42
We *must* comes to grips with the reality of a white underclass, then. To pretend it's all race is
Romulox
Jul 2012
#25
Yeah, it split off the Southern Democrats who couldn't accept that black people were citizens. n/t
EFerrari
Jul 2012
#11
You've not listened to both side of the issue either, you'd never thing it was unfair if the true
uponit7771
Jul 2012
#41
Since AA began in 1961 under JFK and the Voting Rights Act didn't even pass until later,
EFerrari
Jul 2012
#10
I've condensed about 50% of the book into that post. It was a much larger and longer process
patrice
Jul 2012
#12
I have to say that I probably agree more than I don't, though it may be close, with the
patrice
Jul 2012
#4
I'm wondering if we couldn't see that as a change in its priorities. A systematic relationship
patrice
Jul 2012
#16
Then you'd go back to race, seriously people...blacks and Hispanics didn't wake up and say lets be
uponit7771
Jul 2012
#46
You are correct, many of the same people that benefit now would continue to benefit
SickOfTheOnePct
Jul 2012
#54
His sole purpose, and 'long game', is to serve corporations. Simple really. -eom
Huey P. Long
Jul 2012
#26
The last couple of posters have nailed it. Start by guessing which position most helps corporations
Romulox
Jul 2012
#29