Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This is just my opinion... [View all]CrispyQ
(40,974 posts)36. 'NAFTA on Steroids': The Trans-Pacific Partnership (Why didn't we know)
http://www.thenation.com/article/168627/nafta-steroids#
Think of the TPP as a stealthy delivery mechanism for policies that could not survive public scrutiny. Indeed, only two of the twenty-six chapters of this corporate Trojan horse cover traditional trade matters. The rest embody the most florid dreams of the 1 percentgrandiose new rights and privileges for corporations and permanent constraints on government regulation. They include new investor safeguards to ease job offshoring and assert control over natural resources, and severely limit the regulation of financial services, land use, food safety, natural resources, energy, tobacco, healthcare and more.
The stakes are extremely high, because the TPP may well be the last trade agreement Washington negotiates. This is because if its completed, the TPP would remain open for any other country to join. In May US Trade Representative Ron Kirk said he would love nothing more than to have China join. In June Mexico and Canada entered the process, creating a NAFTA on steroids, with most of Asia to boot.
Countries would be obliged to conform all their domestic laws and regulations to the TPPs rulesin effect, a corporate coup détat. The proposed pact would limit even how governments can spend their tax dollars. Buy America and other Buy Local procurement preferences that invest in the US economy would be banned, and sweat-free, human rights or environmental conditions on government contracts could be challenged. If the TPP comes to fruition, its retrograde rules could be altered only if all countries agreed, regardless of domestic election outcomes or changes in public opinion. And unlike much domestic legislation, the TPP would have no expiration date.
Failure to conform domestic laws to the rules would subject countries to lawsuits before TPP tribunals empowered to authorize trade sanctions against member countries. The leaked investment chapter also shows that the TPP would expand the parallel legal system included in NAFTA. Called Investor-State Dispute Resolution, it empowers corporations to sue governmentsoutside their domestic court systemsover any action the corporations believe undermines their expected future profits or rights under the pact. Three-person international tribunals of attorneys from the private sector would hear these cases. The lawyers rotate between serving as judgesempowered to order governments to pay corporations unlimited amounts in finesand representing the corporations that use this system to raid government treasuries. The NAFTA version of this scheme has forced governments to pay more than $350 million to corporations after suits against toxic bans, land-use policies, forestry rules and more.
~more at link
It doesn't matter who's in office, this is where we're headed. The human species is so fucked.
Think of the TPP as a stealthy delivery mechanism for policies that could not survive public scrutiny. Indeed, only two of the twenty-six chapters of this corporate Trojan horse cover traditional trade matters. The rest embody the most florid dreams of the 1 percentgrandiose new rights and privileges for corporations and permanent constraints on government regulation. They include new investor safeguards to ease job offshoring and assert control over natural resources, and severely limit the regulation of financial services, land use, food safety, natural resources, energy, tobacco, healthcare and more.
The stakes are extremely high, because the TPP may well be the last trade agreement Washington negotiates. This is because if its completed, the TPP would remain open for any other country to join. In May US Trade Representative Ron Kirk said he would love nothing more than to have China join. In June Mexico and Canada entered the process, creating a NAFTA on steroids, with most of Asia to boot.
Countries would be obliged to conform all their domestic laws and regulations to the TPPs rulesin effect, a corporate coup détat. The proposed pact would limit even how governments can spend their tax dollars. Buy America and other Buy Local procurement preferences that invest in the US economy would be banned, and sweat-free, human rights or environmental conditions on government contracts could be challenged. If the TPP comes to fruition, its retrograde rules could be altered only if all countries agreed, regardless of domestic election outcomes or changes in public opinion. And unlike much domestic legislation, the TPP would have no expiration date.
Failure to conform domestic laws to the rules would subject countries to lawsuits before TPP tribunals empowered to authorize trade sanctions against member countries. The leaked investment chapter also shows that the TPP would expand the parallel legal system included in NAFTA. Called Investor-State Dispute Resolution, it empowers corporations to sue governmentsoutside their domestic court systemsover any action the corporations believe undermines their expected future profits or rights under the pact. Three-person international tribunals of attorneys from the private sector would hear these cases. The lawyers rotate between serving as judgesempowered to order governments to pay corporations unlimited amounts in finesand representing the corporations that use this system to raid government treasuries. The NAFTA version of this scheme has forced governments to pay more than $350 million to corporations after suits against toxic bans, land-use policies, forestry rules and more.
~more at link
It doesn't matter who's in office, this is where we're headed. The human species is so fucked.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
+1, I read somewhere Luntz et al are MASTERS at framing to get out conservative emotions....
uponit7771
Jul 2012
#21
"This is just my opinion-- XXX is an asshat." Yet for some reason, XXX got mad...
LanternWaste
Jul 2012
#74
ACA was originally called "ROMNEYCARE", when it was first implemented in Mass, though.
Romulox
Jul 2012
#23
A full 40% of the electorate sits on their hands during a PRESIDENTIAL election...
Scuba
Jul 2012
#69
K&R. As you say, tax policies, defense spending, poverty, equality, human rights,
Egalitarian Thug
Jul 2012
#17
Not the philosophical differences but what dems will stand up AGAINST and hollar loud about...
uponit7771
Jul 2012
#20
Economic policy is nearly 1:1: Deregulation, "free trade", bank bailouts, tax cuts for the rich,
Romulox
Jul 2012
#22
Perhaps, but I have a caution to this - the gulf between the informed and uninformed
NRaleighLiberal
Jul 2012
#30
I think the problem is that debate in this country is basically over conservative ideas
Johonny
Jul 2012
#35
Politicians seek votes, and the money to get votes. Not ideals, honesty, or even decency.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jul 2012
#44
I think the philosophical difference is clearly defined. Democrats favor the working man while
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2012
#53
During election season. They know we have the memory of a brain damaged gnat. n/t
Egalitarian Thug
Jul 2012
#78
How very classy. Have the OP banned from his own thread and then continue your rant. n/t
Egalitarian Thug
Jul 2012
#70