Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It's not about Bernie. It's about the way he wants to change the party. [View all]sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)39. Agreed. Focus on what YOU want to do to HELP
Be constructive.
Discuss ideas
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
106 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's not about Bernie. It's about the way he wants to change the party. [View all]
DanTex
Apr 2017
OP
Yup. It's more than coincidence. Everyone suddenly on the bandwagon.
Sculpin Beauregard
Apr 2017
#15
The intention is that he's a Democrat who's supporting the base of the Democratic party --
pnwmom
Apr 2017
#61
Now that DanTex has weighed in, maybe so. He said something that needed to be said
pnwmom
Apr 2017
#56
Because he is leading the charge to transform the party in a economic-over-social manner.
DanTex
Apr 2017
#6
I would vote for the guy if I lived in his city. Always vote for the Democrat.
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#89
Great post. But I give not one shit what Bernie says about the Democratic Party until...
LuvLoogie
Apr 2017
#13
Sorry...that is nonsense...the only progressive achievements are provided by the Democratic
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#90
The social justice "tradeoffs" you attribute for Sanders are one or more steps
PufPuf23
Apr 2017
#36
Bernie, in his own words, has called for a "fundamental transformation" of the D party.
DanTex
Apr 2017
#23
I'm curious - where have "non-establishment" Democrats won where "establishment" ones have not?
Steven Maurer
Apr 2017
#62
What if the majority of members of the Democratic Party do not want to change it?
George II
Apr 2017
#27
Were those 1000 seats lost to candidates that were further left than their Democratic opponents....
George II
Apr 2017
#38
That's my point. We lost those 1000 seats to candidates that were further right than our....
George II
Apr 2017
#54
I found her highly obnoxious in her appearance this morning, and thoroughly enjoyed...
George II
Apr 2017
#43
Women's reproductive health and lives are not mere "social issues." That is Tea Party thinking. (nt)
ehrnst
Apr 2017
#44
He was dismissive of another progressive's bona fides, saying that not all Democrats
pnwmom
Apr 2017
#73
He was criticized for endorsing the anti-abortion guy but being dismissive of a progressive.. n/t
pnwmom
Apr 2017
#76
It is not suspicious at all. It's a natural result of his bashing the Democratic party. n/t
pnwmom
Apr 2017
#66
And ALL that progress is in jeopardy. And for black people, they have made less progress
pnwmom
Apr 2017
#69