Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Democratic Party Draws A Line In The Sand On Abortion Rights [View all]BainsBane
(57,750 posts)4. Because of this
"If we are going to protect a woman's right to choose, at the end of the day we're going to need Democratic control over the House and the Senate, and state governments all over this nation," he said. "And we have got to appreciate where people come from, and do our best to fight for the pro-choice agenda. But I think you just can't exclude people who disagree with us on one issue."
But that call for pragmatism doesn't mesh with the main message Sanders has been delivering this week: a call for a more aggressive and progressive Democratic party. In the same interview, he blamed Republican gains at the state and federal level on "the failure of the Democratic Party to have a progressive agenda, to bring people into this party, to mobilize people."
But that call for pragmatism doesn't mesh with the main message Sanders has been delivering this week: a call for a more aggressive and progressive Democratic party. In the same interview, he blamed Republican gains at the state and federal level on "the failure of the Democratic Party to have a progressive agenda, to bring people into this party, to mobilize people."
http://www.npr.org/2017/04/20/524962482/sanders-defends-campaigning-for-anti-abortion-rights-democrat
We are seeing more and more men acquiesce to or promoting of the abandonment of equal rights under the guise of progressivism. It's becoming increasingly apparent that the calls for economic justice are not justice at all but an effort to promote the increased wealth of one demographic at the expense of civil rights and greater impoverishment for women.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
107 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Leaving your home and the place you're from is a bad solution. I agree with you. nt
cheapdate
Apr 2017
#106
The job of the DNC is to get candidates running as Democrats elected, not define where they are
ehrnst
Apr 2017
#73
in my local cd we had a primary for the congressional candidate....1 was quite pro lie
dembotoz
Apr 2017
#11
Can they personally think abortion is morally wrong, as long as they still support a woman's
PoliticAverse
Apr 2017
#9
"Consistent life ethic".: no war, abortion, or death penalty. jesuits, marynoll sisters.
lostnfound
Apr 2017
#72
If they support the "Hyde Amendment" (no federal funds for abortion) can they still...
PoliticAverse
Apr 2017
#35
If they think it is morally wrong, they should feel perfectly free not to have one. But the moment
Squinch
Apr 2017
#29
Those two aren't necessarily linked. I'm pro-choice but anti-abortion. But as much as I...
George II
Apr 2017
#37
Thank you! I so agree with you about that judgmental "abortion should be rare" tut-tutting!
50 Shades Of Blue
Apr 2017
#46
And that is your choice. In what way has Hillary prevented your choice?????
boston bean
Apr 2017
#55
I personally could not vote for a candidate that is not for reproductive rights.
hrmjustin
Apr 2017
#50
I would vote for him...but it is a mayor's race...so I would not have a rally and spend DNC money.
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#88
That is fine...and I have voted for Tim Ryan who was anti-choice because he was the Democrat
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#95