Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It's not about Bernie. It's about the way he wants to change the party. [View all]Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)90. Sorry...that is nonsense...the only progressive achievements are provided by the Democratic
Party...and the Democratic party must stand for full equality.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
106 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's not about Bernie. It's about the way he wants to change the party. [View all]
DanTex
Apr 2017
OP
Yup. It's more than coincidence. Everyone suddenly on the bandwagon.
Sculpin Beauregard
Apr 2017
#15
The intention is that he's a Democrat who's supporting the base of the Democratic party --
pnwmom
Apr 2017
#61
Now that DanTex has weighed in, maybe so. He said something that needed to be said
pnwmom
Apr 2017
#56
Because he is leading the charge to transform the party in a economic-over-social manner.
DanTex
Apr 2017
#6
I would vote for the guy if I lived in his city. Always vote for the Democrat.
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#89
Great post. But I give not one shit what Bernie says about the Democratic Party until...
LuvLoogie
Apr 2017
#13
Sorry...that is nonsense...the only progressive achievements are provided by the Democratic
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#90
The social justice "tradeoffs" you attribute for Sanders are one or more steps
PufPuf23
Apr 2017
#36
Bernie, in his own words, has called for a "fundamental transformation" of the D party.
DanTex
Apr 2017
#23
I'm curious - where have "non-establishment" Democrats won where "establishment" ones have not?
Steven Maurer
Apr 2017
#62
What if the majority of members of the Democratic Party do not want to change it?
George II
Apr 2017
#27
Were those 1000 seats lost to candidates that were further left than their Democratic opponents....
George II
Apr 2017
#38
That's my point. We lost those 1000 seats to candidates that were further right than our....
George II
Apr 2017
#54
I found her highly obnoxious in her appearance this morning, and thoroughly enjoyed...
George II
Apr 2017
#43
Women's reproductive health and lives are not mere "social issues." That is Tea Party thinking. (nt)
ehrnst
Apr 2017
#44
He was dismissive of another progressive's bona fides, saying that not all Democrats
pnwmom
Apr 2017
#73
He was criticized for endorsing the anti-abortion guy but being dismissive of a progressive.. n/t
pnwmom
Apr 2017
#76
It is not suspicious at all. It's a natural result of his bashing the Democratic party. n/t
pnwmom
Apr 2017
#66
And ALL that progress is in jeopardy. And for black people, they have made less progress
pnwmom
Apr 2017
#69