Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

juxtaposed

(2,778 posts)
1. they need a bigger rug
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 03:56 PM
Apr 2017

Lifetime pro-choice record, plus funding for family planning. (Sep 2015)
Advocate for family planning and funding for contraceptives. (Sep 2015)
Women have the right to choose, regardless of income. (Jun 1997)
Voted NO on restricting UN funding for population control policies. (Mar 2009)
Voted NO on defining unborn child as eligible for SCHIP. (Mar 2008)
Voted NO on prohibiting minors crossing state lines for abortion. (Mar 2008)
Voted NO on barring HHS grants to organizations that perform abortions. (Oct 2007)
Voted YES on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines. (Apr 2007)
Voted YES on allowing human embryonic stem cell research. (May 2005)
Voted NO on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions. (Apr 2005)
Voted NO on making it a crime to harm a fetus during another crime. (Feb 2004)
Voted NO on banning partial-birth abortion except to save mother’s life. (Oct 2003)
Voted YES on forbidding human cloning for reproduction & medical research. (Feb 2003)
Voted NO on funding for health providers who don't provide abortion info. (Sep 2002)
Voted NO on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad. (May 2001)
Voted NO on banning partial-birth abortions. (Apr 2000)
Voted NO on barring transporting minors to get an abortion. (Jun 1999)
Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record. (Dec 2003)
Emergency contraception for rape victims at all hospitals. (Sep 2006)
Rated 0% by the NRLC, indicating a pro-choice stance. (Dec 2006)
Provide emergency contraception at military facilities. (Apr 2007)
Require pharmacies to fulfill contraceptive prescriptions. (Jul 2011)
Ban anti-abortion limitations on abortion services. (Nov 2013)
Access safe, legal abortion without restrictions. (Jan 2015)
Protect the reproductive rights of women. (Jan 1993)
Ensure access to and funding for contraception. (Feb 2007)
Focus on preventing pregnancy, plus emergency contraception. (Jan 2009)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

they need a bigger rug juxtaposed Apr 2017 #1
Ah, but you didn't include all the fine print! Tom Rinaldo Apr 2017 #5
Totally irrelevant to the conversation which is about Sanders openly supporting an anti-choice KittyWampus Apr 2017 #37
Yep. cwydro Apr 2017 #39
Who cares? leftofcool Apr 2017 #2
Interesting Tom Rinaldo Apr 2017 #3
The corporate shills are scared stiff and doing all they can to discredit Sanders. kristopher Apr 2017 #8
"corporate shills" i.e. "people with a different opinion than mine" Dem2 Apr 2017 #31
Well, people with different values certainly. kristopher Apr 2017 #43
Thanks for posting! Great info! VigilantG Apr 2017 #4
But he is not a member of the party. safeinOhio Apr 2017 #6
That's a really important point ProfessorPlum Apr 2017 #7
The irony of that can be painful sometimes n/t Tom Rinaldo Apr 2017 #9
only half? quakerboy Apr 2017 #10
Heh. Irony alert. progressoid Apr 2017 #11
Yep, I would say (with irony) that there was lots of Democrat bashing in the OP except... Tom Rinaldo Apr 2017 #23
Good point. Thanks for reminding us that Sanders has a stellar record on reproductive rights. beam me up scottie Apr 2017 #12
What's your point? Gman Apr 2017 #13
I am worried about Party unity. What about you? Tom Rinaldo Apr 2017 #19
Nobody but one or two, maybe 3 in the country worry about it Gman Apr 2017 #20
Well there appear to be at least 5-6 right here on the forum. Kentonio Apr 2017 #24
How many members does DU have? Are 5 or 6 people a big majority of members? emulatorloo Apr 2017 #27
Nope Kentonio Apr 2017 #34
Thanks for the laugh! n/t emulatorloo Apr 2017 #36
those alleging a concern with party unity seem to be those working most strongly against it. LanternWaste Apr 2017 #40
I see that pattern too but I don't know if we are looking in the same place or not Tom Rinaldo Apr 2017 #41
Way too many Bernie threads popping up lately. Chicago1980 Apr 2017 #14
exactly! elmac Apr 2017 #16
No Plucketeer Apr 2017 #17
+1000 nt diva77 Apr 2017 #35
yawn elmac Apr 2017 #15
Seriously!!! IndianaKev Apr 2017 #18
Read the link? Duppers Apr 2017 #21
There is an obvious attempt to purge Sanders supporters going on. nt Snotcicles Apr 2017 #22
Indeed. Duppers Apr 2017 #25
LOL NurseJackie Apr 2017 #26
Sanders supporters make up the majority of DU emulatorloo Apr 2017 #28
I know. It can't be good for Skinner's fund drives though. nt Snotcicles Apr 2017 #29
Are you suggesting Skinner wants to purge Sanders supporters? emulatorloo Apr 2017 #30
Not at all. But I think his bottom line suffers from it. nt Snotcicles Apr 2017 #32
Well I still don't thing Sanders supporters are gonna be purged because of a handful of threads emulatorloo Apr 2017 #33
Sanders' own record is irrelevant to the conversation. In fact, the OP is a non sequitur KittyWampus Apr 2017 #38
Could we retire this "outreach" canard that's been repeatedly refuted? Jim Lane Apr 2017 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How will Bernie try to de...»Reply #1