Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Demsrule86

(71,542 posts)
29. It is true. See below.
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 10:18 AM
Apr 2017
http://www.legislature.ne.gov/FloorDocs/101/PDF/Slip/LB1103.pdf

LEGISLATIVE BILL 1103
Legislation bill 1103

Approved by the Governor April 13, 2010
Introduced by Flood, 19; McCoy, 39; Langemeier, 23; Pirsch, 4; Fulton, 29;
Coash, 27; Krist, 10; Schilz, 47; Heidemann, 1; Utter, 33;
Stuthman, 22; Wallman, 30; Dubas, 34; Sullivan, 41; Fischer,
43; Janssen, 15; Price, 3; Harms, 48; Cornett, 45; Gay, 14;
Nordquist, 7; [font color="red" size="4"="face"]Mello[/font] , 5; Lautenbaugh, 18.
FOR AN ACT relating to abortion; to amend section 38-2021, Reissue
Revised Statutes of Nebraska, and section 28-101, Revised Statutes
Supplement, 2009; to adopt the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection
Act; to provide and change civil and criminal penalties with respect
to abortion; to harmonize provisions; to provide an operative date;
to provide severability; and to repeal the original sections.
Be it enacted by the people of the State of Nebraska,
Section 1. Sections 1 to 10 of this act shall be known and may be
cited as the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act.
Sec. 2. For purposes of the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection
Act:
(1) Abortion means the use or prescription of any instrument,
medicine, drug, or other substance or device to terminate the pregnancy of
a woman known to be pregnant with an intention other than to increase the
probability of a live birth, to preserve the life or health of the child after
live birth, or to remove a dead unborn child who died as the result of natural
causes in utero, accidental trauma, or a criminal assault on the pregnant
woman or her unborn child, and which causes the premature termination of the
pregnancy;
(2) Attempt to perform or induce an abortion means an act, or an
omission of a statutorily required act, that, under the circumstances as the
actor believes them to be, constitutes a substantial step in a course of
conduct planned to culminate in the performance or induction of an abortion in
this state in violation of the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act;
(3) Fertilization means the fusion of a human spermatozoon with a
human ovum;
(4) Medical emergency means a condition which, in reasonable medical
judgment, so complicates the medical condition of the pregnant woman as to
necessitate the immediate abortion of her pregnancy to avert her death or
for which a delay will create a serious risk of substantial and irreversible
physical impairment of a major bodily function. No condition shall be deemed a
medical emergency if based on a claim or diagnosis that the woman will engage
in conduct which would result in her death or in substantial and irreversible
physical impairment of a major bodily function;
(5) Postfertilization age means the age of the unborn child as
calculated from the fertilization of the human ovum;
(6) Reasonable medical judgment means a medical judgment that would
be made by a reasonably prudent physician, knowledgeable about the case and
the treatment possibilities with respect to the medical conditions involved;
(7) Physician means any person licensed to practice medicine and
surgery or osteopathic medicine under the Uniform Credentialing Act;
(8) Probable postfertilization age of the unborn child means what,
in reasonable medical judgment, will with reasonable probability be the
postfertilization age of the unborn child at the time the abortion is planned
to be performed;
(9) Unborn child or fetus each mean an individual organism of the
species homo sapiens from fertilization until live birth; and
(10) Woman means a female human being whether or not she has reached
the age of majority.
Sec. 3. The Legislature makes the following findings:
(1) At least by twenty weeks after fertilization there is
substantial evidence that an unborn child has the physical structures
necessary to experience pain;
(2) There is substantial evidence that, by twenty weeks after
fertilization, unborn children seek to evade certain stimuli in a manner which
in an infant or an adult would be interpreted as a response to pain;
(3) Anesthesia is routinely administered to unborn children who
have developed twenty weeks or more past fertilization who undergo prenatal
surgery;
(4) Even before twenty weeks after fertilization, unborn children
have been observed to exhibit hormonal stress responses to painful stimuli.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

You don't see the problem with insisting we must run progressive canididates and Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #1
Please tell Nancy Pelosi and Dick Durbin they don't understand politics, then. Explain to Sanders Akamai Apr 2017 #2
I already called their offices. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #4
I believe this is exactly was is going on: Ligyron Apr 2017 #21
I agree with you on this! Akamai Apr 2017 #60
Partially is being too generous melman Apr 2017 #58
Yup, Yup, Yup, Yup, Yup. Akamai Apr 2017 #61
He might be, time will tell. Tom Rinaldo Apr 2017 #20
I don't have a problem with pro-life views. I do have a problem with those views Vinca Apr 2017 #3
The thing that makes me so angry is the idea that women can Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #5
Did you read Omaha Steve's excellent clarification of the mischaracterization of Akamai Apr 2017 #6
Was this misrepresented? Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #7
That if true, is of concern. But one does not know if it is true, what the circumstances were, etc. Akamai Apr 2017 #8
This out of the way mayoral race was a catalyst for division ehrnst Apr 2017 #11
Omaha is the 44th ranked U.S. metrolpolitan area based by population Tom Rinaldo Apr 2017 #22
Exactly. nt JTFrog Apr 2017 #40
It is true. See below. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #29
Yes, true in 2010 Tom Rinaldo Apr 2017 #43
He is not in the legislature anymore...you have no idea how he would vote today...we can only go by Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #45
That and the pledges he now makes Tom Rinaldo Apr 2017 #46
He should not have been endorsed...voting for him given his anti-choice voting Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #47
thank you for this much-needed clarification ProfessorPlum Apr 2017 #10
Yes we read Steve's gratuitous smears of Tim Kaine, who has a solid Pro-Choice voting record. emulatorloo Apr 2017 #27
Mello supported NE 1103 Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #31
Democrats aren't going to get elected without their strong support for social justice issues ehrnst Apr 2017 #9
I agree, and certainly Pelosi, Durbin, Schumer, and Sanders (among many other progressives) are Akamai Apr 2017 #13
This is what Durbin actually said-from the article Progressive dog Apr 2017 #12
Mello has repeatedly said (as did JFK) that although he is personally opposed to abortion, he would Akamai Apr 2017 #15
That does not make sense given his voting record... Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #35
Are Pelosi and Durbin deluded about Mello? Are they lacking in knowledge? Akamai Apr 2017 #37
Durbin said that pro-life belief is not a deal breaker if you don't vote against choice...you know Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #39
Mello's actual action about abortion Progressive dog Apr 2017 #55
I'm pro-choice. Period. It's one of those issues that is not negotiable, as far as I'm concerned. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #14
As Spock would say, "That's illogical." If Trump suddenly turn into one who supported Akamai Apr 2017 #17
I don't think you're reading my post correctly. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #18
I like Bernie. I don't know why he felt compelled to praise Mello as a progressive. emulatorloo Apr 2017 #32
Jane Kleeb is the chair of the Democratic Party in nebraska. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #48
Thanks for the info. Makes perfect sense. emulatorloo Apr 2017 #49
Yes...I could not understand selecting a mayor's race before I found this out. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #50
No. They aren't suddenly holding Sanders to a different standard. kcr Apr 2017 #34
so it dials back to being pissed that Bernie wants to "change the party" or whatever. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #56
Why are you dragging HRC into this? She has a solid pro-choice record and has fought emulatorloo Apr 2017 #28
So, given that there are two people in a race Bettie Apr 2017 #25
I agree with your last sentence. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #54
Given where I live, we often need to concede Bettie Apr 2017 #57
Lucky you. Grampa Reefer Madness and the Pig Castration Lady. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #59
The perfect is the enemy of the good except when it comes to trade and guns. LexVegas Apr 2017 #16
Pelosi and Durbin aren't ideological purists. They don't have a holier-than-thou attitude. KittyWampus Apr 2017 #19
The only people bitching back and forth are the hard core Hillary and hard core Bernie people snooper2 Apr 2017 #23
It is the 21st fucking century and it seems like DURHAM D Apr 2017 #24
When you vote to deny women health care coverage for abortion as Mellow did... Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #41
Correct. nt DURHAM D Apr 2017 #44
Mello is running for mayor. Not House or Senate. Ossoff is running for the House. emulatorloo Apr 2017 #26
Who said Mello was a real, extreme progressive? No one I know. Akamai Apr 2017 #38
Who said anyone called Mello an "extreme progressive" No one I know. emulatorloo Apr 2017 #42
I don't see Mello as very progressive either, but in a city race where the other is a true Akamai Apr 2017 #51
Can a person be a Republican and still believe in abortion and birth control? OregonBlue Apr 2017 #30
How do you feel about not allowing insurance to cover abortion? Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #36
"Believe in abortion"? What does this phrasing even mean? WinkyDink Apr 2017 #64
That women have the right to decide whether to carry a fetus to term or not. OregonBlue Apr 2017 #66
Other leaders don't put a purity test on a pathway to citizenship for tens of millions. NCTraveler Apr 2017 #33
Yes Dems CAN be right to lifers...they just cant... samnsara Apr 2017 #52
You're right -- and Mello has said that he would not impose his views on others. Akamai Apr 2017 #62
The Democratic term is not "right to life." It is "anti-choice." Another non-negotiable. WinkyDink Apr 2017 #65
The "right-to-life" group is a religious organization benpollard Apr 2017 #53
Women's Rights are non-negotiable, THE SAME WAY MEN'S RIGHTS ARE. End of story. WinkyDink Apr 2017 #63
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yesterday some top Dems s...»Reply #29