General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]emulatorloo
(46,153 posts)If you truly believe "abstinence education" is the same as voting to not allow insurance companies to pay for legal abortions, I can't help you.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10028970435#post36
36. How do you feel about not allowing insurance to cover abortion?
because Mello voted for that also...what about carrying dead babies? the 20 and 24 week bans have forced women to carry dead babies to term risking their health in states that have 20 or 24 week bans. you can click on the links in the except below...and see how Mello voted...it takes you to the actual NE bills.
Mello is a sponsor of the final version of a 20-week abortion ban approved by the governor in 2010, and cast anti-choice votes in favor of requiring physicians to be physically present for an abortion in order to impede access to telemedicine abortion care, and a law banning insurance plans in the state from covering abortions. He was endorsed in 2010 by anti-choice group Nebraska Right to Life.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/omaha-mayoral-candidate-under-fire-says-he-would-never-do-anything-to-restrict-access-to-reproductive-health-care_us_58f8e868e4b018a9ce590a84
----
Agreed, yes we have better things to do. You can say Mello and Kaine's are the "same" all you would like. The record does not support that assertion though.
Again Bernie's not pushing this false equivalency.
It really isn't necessary for DU'ers to push it because of some misguided idea that it "helps" Bernie.
It doesn't help Bernie at all.
Have a great week, I appreciate the discussion.
