General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Democratic Dream Team Needed [View all]hughee99
(16,113 posts)First, Clinton is older (by about two years). While you may call this ageism, it wouldn't seem to be sexism.
Second, that "the pukes have convinced the stupid beyond all hope 3rd of the county that she is toxic". Surely some of this is related to sexism and that will affect Warren as well, but the republicans have been going after Clinton for decades and have demonized her to the extent that they would have a hard time repeating for any candidate over just the next few years. Clinton has problems that go well beyond just the sexism that Warren would face.
You can argue about the extent of it, but these are both things that would seem to give at least some advantage to Warren over Clinton, even assuming that the sexism is equal for both candidates. So why is expressing a preference for Warren "a bit sexist"?