Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bernie, There Will Be No Revolution Without Reproductive Rights [View all]Rilgin
(797 posts)124. ok here is the link
As you mention I have seen a news report saying that Turner and Ellison used the term "rising star" using quotes in the article implying they actually used those words. This is attribution of words to a speaker and it would interest me as to why Turner and Ellison said that and what they meant.
However, that was not your line of attack. You wanted to attack Bernie for words and sentiments he did not express and changed a reporter's summary (which the video itself shows to be wrong) to be a quote. The real motive is Bernie bashing which is the opposite of Unity.
Our whole back and forth started when you titled your post he (meaning Bernie) said "Rising Star" using quotes. I told you he didn't say it and you insisted he did. You then brought in a times article as proof that he said it even though the Times does not attribute it as a quote like you did. Now I have even shown you a direct quote of Bernie on why he wants Mello to win and the actual video where the times reported that he said future star (without quotes). The video shows that Bernie did not say future star. Is it time to maybe unring the bell and go back to your claim and state that maybe you were wrong.
So look at the video you asked about and find the words future star or rising star and get back to us.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
131 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That revolution won't make it far disregarding the bodily autonomy of 50% of progressives.
ehrnst
Apr 2017
#3
It's been framed as "women wanting to reject childbearing" instead of women wanting consent
ehrnst
Apr 2017
#50
Bernie's a tough guy, he can handle a little criticism over a somewhat odd endorsement
emulatorloo
Apr 2017
#126
Sanders it about Sanders: Democratic party should tell Trump call Hillary for help
lewebley3
Apr 2017
#13
I join you. What I'm hearing, and reading... and the OUTRAGEOUS and CONTORTED defense of it...
NurseJackie
Apr 2017
#97
I'm ok w/someone being personally anti-abortion. But forcing others to behave...
Honeycombe8
Apr 2017
#18
There is a reason that the women's movement broke off from the left in the 60's.
ehrnst
Apr 2017
#27
Reproductive rights ARE an economic issue. That's why the republicans continually try...
George II
Apr 2017
#21
And certain "progressives" try to cut it off from the larger discussion of "progress."
ehrnst
Apr 2017
#28
It's more of a web than a hierarchy. But that's a rather feminine way of looking at things
ehrnst
Apr 2017
#39
I understand. I wish that others understood that there is no way to throw one under the bus
ehrnst
Apr 2017
#54
When the hell did VP candidate Tim Kaine say that he was against full access to reproductive rights?
ehrnst
Apr 2017
#59
Ironically, many Sanders people insisted that Hillary could not be trusted on abortion.
StevieM
Apr 2017
#48
Reproductive rights are also an economic issue and a fundamental premise of what Democrats stand for
Gothmog
Apr 2017
#68
The problem is that you appear to have made up this quote with regard to Sanders
Rilgin
Apr 2017
#71
And Nina Turner who left the Democratic party and Keith Ellison are reported to have said it too..
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#75
Thanks...you can look at the video or ask the New York Times for a retraction if you think
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#125
Corey Booker has a robust progressive record, but a single vote against a symbolic amendment
ehrnst
Apr 2017
#83
You need read what Mello voted for including denying insurance coverage for abortion.
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#94
They did not give him an 'F' rating...that is on a GOP website by the way...they refused to endorse
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#96
This happened before he was governor in 2005 so he could not have passed legislation.
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#108
A license plate isn't the same as voting to ban insurance companies from paying for abortions.
emulatorloo
Apr 2017
#128
he defends his position on this, suggesting that we need Dems to have a majority to
JCanete
Apr 2017
#72
Mello ... IS ... bad on this issue, if Mello took money from wall street there would be no question
uponit7771
Apr 2017
#87
I agree its problematic. I think I defined a difference(edit: nope, not in this particular post)
JCanete
Apr 2017
#100
No, that has nothing to do with endorsing a mayoral candidate which would not give us
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#90
They know that already. They're just making a CONTORTED deflection and ABSURD defense of someone...
NurseJackie
Apr 2017
#98
Jane Kleeb a supporter of our revolution is the chair of the Nebraska Democratic party...
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#101
Please don't assume I'm not arguing in good faith. And next time, maybe even read my post...
JCanete
Apr 2017
#102
There is no logic for spending time and money on a unimportant mayoral race...
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#107
I can't argue with you on the Dem party, I don't know how things are generally done, but
JCanete
Apr 2017
#109
I have no desire for Sanders to eat 'shit'... only want him to stop criticizing
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#112