Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is this all because Bernie endorsed ONE LOCAL CANDIDATE IN A LOCAL RACE [View all]Omaha Steve
(109,407 posts)60. Heres the truth about Mellos record
https://www.thenation.com/article/why-was-heath-mello-thrown-under-the-bus/
Instead, on April 19, The Wall Street Journal ran a story noting that Mello, a practicing Catholic, is pro-life. The story also falsely claimed that Mello had co-sponsored a bill requiring women to look at an ultrasound image of their fetus before receiving an abortion. A similar error was made by The Washington Post, which claimed that Mello had previously backed a bill requiring ultrasounds for women considering abortions, and then again the following day by David Nir, political director of Daily Kos, who announced the site was withdrawing its endorsement of Melloa move applauded by Ilyse Hogue, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, whod launched a 12-part Twitter storm linking to the WSJ article and accusing Sanders and Perez of kicking off their tour with the message shame women; well support u anyway.
Back in 2009, he co-sponsored a bill requiring a physician performing an abortion to tell a woman that an ultrasound is available (as most already did). It neither mandated that the ultrasound be performed nor, if performed, that it actually be viewed by the womanalthough it did require abortion providers to position the screen in such a way that the ultrasound was easily viewable. Daily Kos member Nova Landa Tennessean who had never heard of Mello before the controversyposted a comprehensive, well-sourced correction to this effect the same day. That didnt lead Nir to reconsider. Nor did it stop Perez from issuing a statement announcing that he fundamentally disagree[s] with Heath Mellos personal beliefs about womens reproductive health, which was worded in a way that appeared to cast doubt on the sincerity of Mellos pledge that he would never do anything to restrict access to reproductive health care.
Whats more interesting is what happened nextand what didnt. In 2012, Mello voted with Planned Parenthood on two out of three bills tracked by the groupand was excused from voting on the third. After that, Mello, who had become the influential chair of the state legislatures budget committee, voted with Planned Parenthood 100 percent of the time. By 2015, the group was celebrating a fourth straight year without enacting any new abortion restrictions in Nebraska, thanks largely to committed womens health advocates engaged in the legislative process.
But in Omaha, the DNCs response was greeted with dismay. It was Heaths credibility with pro-life legislators that enabled him to take mandatory ultrasounds off the table and substitute a bill that stated that women had a choice to have one and to see the image, said Jane Kleeb, chair of the Nebraska Democratic Party, of the ultrasound legislation. The competing bill not only required ultrasounds before an abortion; it also required clinics to position the screen so that women would be forced to view the fetus.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Is this all because Bernie endorsed ONE LOCAL CANDIDATE IN A LOCAL RACE [View all]
retrowire
Apr 2017
OP
No, it isn't. It's been explained to you many times this is about Sanders' own rhetoric
KittyWampus
Apr 2017
#27
You know this is false on its face, party is ready to bash on Benedict Donald not selective purism
uponit7771
Apr 2017
#61
No, there is a huge difference of opinion between the Third-Way Dems and the Sanders' message
Samantha
Apr 2017
#13
Well, Nancy Pelosi said recently Democrats do not want changes; they like things the way they are
Samantha
Apr 2017
#84
No, there's the little matter of who he didn't endorse recently and why. Then there's his insults
KittyWampus
Apr 2017
#17
+1, they're not being obtuse at this point ... the RECENT statements from Sanders doesn't need all
uponit7771
Apr 2017
#62
There are many personally "pro-life" Democrats in various positions of power in the party...
TCJ70
Apr 2017
#20
Which is irrelevant to the conversation about Sanders being pragmatic about women's rights
KittyWampus
Apr 2017
#28
Mello voted to ban abortions at 20 weeks and to deny health care for abortions and to insist a
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#39
You left out the part where he sponsored a ban on abortion at 20 weeks...unacceptable.
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#68
Joe Biden once voted for a late-term abortion ban and received low marks from NARAL in 1999 and 2003
Omaha Steve
Apr 2017
#70
I don't want the anti-choice Democratic candidate endorsed by party leaders.
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#73
Bold Nebraska has been fighting Keystone XL since day one, guess who they endorsed for mayor
Omaha Steve
Apr 2017
#86
Nope, it's been an ongoing split. Or didn't you see what happened in 2016, when a non-Democrat
RedWedge
Apr 2017
#31
no, it's his hypocrisy around party purity and then his support for a non progressive
La Lioness Priyanka
Apr 2017
#36
Nailed it. If he wants to fantasize about being our fearless leader, he needs to do so privately.
randome
Apr 2017
#48
DOES WRITING IN ALL CAPS MAKE IT SOUND LIKE THIS POST IS SMARTER THAN IT ACTUALLY IS?
La Lioness Priyanka
Apr 2017
#85