Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
46. Because a mayor is like a Congressman?
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 08:41 AM
Apr 2017

Or enough so that identical standards and backing should always be employed? On identical timelines?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

How many votes do the REPUBLIANS need to damage Abortion rights? fun n serious Apr 2017 #1
We can't.. coco22 Apr 2017 #2
The ACA passed without a single vote to spare. If one of those "conservative democrat" seats... PoliticAverse Apr 2017 #3
So the wide tent coalition held? SticksnStones Apr 2017 #10
I thought the goal was to primary people like Manchin and Heidikamp BainsBane Apr 2017 #4
I'm not making an argument, I'm asking for people's input regarding strategy. Kentonio Apr 2017 #5
But the real progressive designation is precisely what started this BainsBane Apr 2017 #8
Thank you! boston bean Apr 2017 #12
I'm not making an argument, I'm asking for people's input regarding strategy. Kentonio Apr 2017 #16
I'm giving my input BainsBane Apr 2017 #25
I specifically requested people not to talk about individuals or primary fights Kentonio Apr 2017 #57
Sorry, dude. Discussing what Bernie does/says in 2017 is NOT "refighting the primary". NurseJackie Apr 2017 #72
Post removed Post removed Apr 2017 #77
Nobody is attacking anybody. NurseJackie Apr 2017 #85
WHOA!! WTH!!! Our Group IS the Democratic Party.. Cha Apr 2017 #122
You know, you are derailing your own thread. MineralMan Apr 2017 #96
You want to omit actual cases from your discussion BainsBane Apr 2017 #88
"Primary Fights"? You're the only one who keeps bringing that Cha Apr 2017 #124
Yeah - I thought he was asking for a conversation JustAnotherGen Apr 2017 #93
Exactly right! endorsing Parriello in the Virginia governor's primary Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #44
Good point Proud Liberal Dem Apr 2017 #106
As a Democrat living in Texas, I agree with your analysis Gothmog Apr 2017 #112
You don't get to decide what people discuss in replies. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #45
I've repeatedly asked very politely for this one thread to be kept to the issue in the op Kentonio Apr 2017 #51
LOLOLOLOLOL. JTFrog Apr 2017 #54
You want it hidden because your argument doesn't work with real life examples. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #66
For the thousandth time, I'm not making a damn argument. Kentonio Apr 2017 #68
Yes you are. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #73
What are you afraid of? If you TRULY wanted opinions, you'd let the conversation go where it goes... NurseJackie Apr 2017 #74
Post removed Post removed Apr 2017 #78
. George II Apr 2017 #82
Yes indeed. (Thank you.) NurseJackie Apr 2017 #87
Thank you Gothmog Apr 2017 #111
Exactly BainsBane Apr 2017 #89
Congratulations zipplewrath Apr 2017 #94
Bate? NurseJackie Apr 2017 #100
Presumption on my part zipplewrath Apr 2017 #116
Well, it appears that you've presumed incorrectly then... AND again now. NurseJackie Apr 2017 #117
Yes I saw that zipplewrath Apr 2017 #120
You're blaming the wrong person... NurseJackie Apr 2017 #123
Tou*******Che'! Cha Apr 2017 #126
Sister Dorthy zipplewrath Apr 2017 #130
Dorothy Zbornak: Oh good grief, Rose! NurseJackie Apr 2017 #131
Rapped knuckles zipplewrath Apr 2017 #132
LOL NurseJackie Apr 2017 #133
Did you mean to address that to the removed post and poster? Vesper Apr 2017 #108
Look, I have to be honest with you, there are serious issues with the way you dialogue with people. stevenleser Apr 2017 #105
You might want to look that mirror there, it's been about nothing but personal insults Vesper Apr 2017 #109
Demsrule! Cha Apr 2017 #121
You can't separate it from that context, though. kcr Apr 2017 #97
Nicely done. A thoughtful, concise and factual reply. NurseJackie Apr 2017 #104
This isn't about the Damn primary as too many are Cha Apr 2017 #118
Not the only goal. Orsino Apr 2017 #6
Again, that isn't the concern. BainsBane Apr 2017 #9
There's more than one concern. Orsino Apr 2017 #17
This started due to a mayor's race BainsBane Apr 2017 #27
I would rather have seen Ossof get endorsed earlier and more heavily, too. Orsino Apr 2017 #32
You most certainly can BainsBane Apr 2017 #38
Because a mayor is like a Congressman? Orsino Apr 2017 #46
That is right...so why was the pro-choice Democrat ignored in the VA governors race? Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #48
Because party leadership doesn't always agree with me? Orsino Apr 2017 #52
This is who Perriello is... Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #64
That's who he was in Goode's district... Orsino Apr 2017 #67
It has not been a decade and Perriello started changing his positions after he signed up to run... Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #76
Thanks for this information JustAnotherGen Apr 2017 #80
It does get confusing, doesn't it? mcar Apr 2017 #33
Now apparently talking about current races BainsBane Apr 2017 #35
Seems like it's happening in the present so I don't get that argument mcar Apr 2017 #37
Gaslighting BainsBane Apr 2017 #39
I won't be gaslighted either mcar Apr 2017 #40
Ah yes Kentonio Apr 2017 #71
yeah, they be tryin' Cha Apr 2017 #119
Primarying Machin would be a mistake. Donald Ian Rankin Apr 2017 #114
I'm not arguing that BainsBane Apr 2017 #115
As a factual matter wouldn't having some conservative Dems make it more likely we have a majority. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2017 #7
That's also a good point. Kentonio Apr 2017 #11
Well, welcome aboard to pragmatism. boston bean Apr 2017 #13
Do you think following people around insulting them is a useful way to communicate your ideas? Kentonio Apr 2017 #18
You found that comment insulting??? Second, I don't follow you around... you just pop up boston bean Apr 2017 #20
Yes, I did find it insulting. Kentonio Apr 2017 #24
maybe, maybe not. What I've seen from you is elevation of a person and that persons ideas. boston bean Apr 2017 #28
I've always seen a bigger picture Kentonio Apr 2017 #36
"...without assumptions of motive being made." LOL! Like accusing people of hijacking threads? NurseJackie Apr 2017 #90
I agree...I voted for Tim Ryan before his epipheny on pro-choice. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #34
Being the majority party in both houses of Congress is what matters most Lee-Lee Apr 2017 #14
Good post. I lean towards the first option. DanTex Apr 2017 #15
You're probably right. Kentonio Apr 2017 #19
I'd love to be proven wrong and see a progressive elected in WV or ND. DanTex Apr 2017 #23
That becomes the calculation really doesn't it. Kentonio Apr 2017 #30
You left out Perriello in the Virginia governor's primary where Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #21
I stated very clearly that this isn't a thread about individuals Kentonio Apr 2017 #26
Why is that? Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #41
There are already at least half a dozen threads where people are discussing individuals Kentonio Apr 2017 #50
Because the OP's entire case falls apart if you use real life examples like Perriello. FSogol Apr 2017 #56
exactly right...and Perriello also voted for drilling off Virginia's coast ...so I guess Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #58
Have we suddenly been transported into opposite world? Kentonio Apr 2017 #60
Saying "don't use examples of politicians" is a cop out. That's what my comment referenced. FSogol Apr 2017 #63
How can I want people to agree with me, when I don't have an answer? Kentonio Apr 2017 #65
Look, I'm a Democrat for a reason. hamsterjill Apr 2017 #22
At one time, there were 'liberal, moderate, conservative' Democrats and building concensus was the Donkees Apr 2017 #29
What do you think has caused the switch? Kentonio Apr 2017 #31
Abandoning the 50 state strategy dismantled the infrastucture which strengthened local candidates. Donkees Apr 2017 #53
Yeah, makes sense. It does seem crazy to me that we have races where we don't even run candidates Kentonio Apr 2017 #55
Yes! Yes! Yes! Phoenix61 Apr 2017 #103
Personally I don't see much point in any of this. Scruffy1 Apr 2017 #42
I guess I was thinking more in terms of who we support nationally with cash and endorsements Kentonio Apr 2017 #61
I consider "conservative democrats" to be displaced republicans. no_hypocrisy Apr 2017 #43
Heath Shuler is a good case study Lee-Lee Apr 2017 #47
Out of curiousity, do you know if he actually voted against or abstained on many of those? Kentonio Apr 2017 #62
He did Lee-Lee Apr 2017 #75
If individual replies could be "liked" or "recommended"... I'd choose THIS one! NurseJackie Apr 2017 #69
Me Too, NJ DarthDem Apr 2017 #79
Heath was in the Nebraska legislature so he had nothing to do with the bils you are talking about. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #99
Umm, Heath Shuler was a Democrat Congressman from NC Lee-Lee Apr 2017 #110
Sorry I thought it was Mello you were talking about. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #127
He is actually worse than Mello whom I somehow thought we were talking about... Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #128
It is a conundrum treestar Apr 2017 #49
Part of it is to understand their issues are not always the same as yours Lee-Lee Apr 2017 #59
I think there's a lot of truth to that. Kentonio Apr 2017 #70
Yes. Maybe gun control is more for urban areas treestar Apr 2017 #92
And it plays out in rural areas as "big city" elites out of touch Lee-Lee Apr 2017 #98
Democrats did fine in the south before the republican party convinced a good number of CrispyQ Apr 2017 #81
True, but there is much more to it than that. Caliman73 Apr 2017 #86
Nationally, I don't think we have much choice Bradical79 Apr 2017 #83
Theoretically, the whole taxation/representation premise MedusaX Apr 2017 #84
It's all about money zipplewrath Apr 2017 #91
It is impossible to discuss your topic without using examples. MineralMan Apr 2017 #95
The OP describes a political environment where voters HeartachesNhangovers Apr 2017 #101
You say "we." Cary Apr 2017 #102
I hate the idea of forced purity. It leads to low quality candidates with no support, imo. Oneironaut Apr 2017 #107
It's very tricky loyalsister Apr 2017 #113
It would help to understand that there are radical differences between these red areas. wildeyed Apr 2017 #125
I have to say I see some supporting conservadems who have slammed them previously. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #129
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ok, let's talk about cons...»Reply #46