Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: You know why some think there's little difference between the two parties? [View all]DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)24. K&R
''The problem, really, is idiotic attempts at triangulation. When Bill Clinton first adopted the strategy on 1992 and onwards, it worked remarkably well for him, and drove the GOP nuts, because he had adopted and claimed credits for many of their ideas (i.e. Welfare reform) while allowing him to push his own policy objectives (i.e. tax policy).
Since then, however, the GOP has learned to game the triangulation strategy. Its simple. Triangulation is just another word for meeting the opposition half way. If you are in the opposition and want to successfully counter (or game) your opponents triangulation strategy, all you need to do is move so absurdly to the right that your opponents triangulation position falls precisely where you want it to fall. Instead of your opponent playing you, you are now playing him.
I only half-blame Bill Clinton for this. He may have been the first to successfully implement the strategy, but its a lack of imagination on the part of recent Democrats that they continue to rely on the strategy, even as its painfully obvious that its working against them.'' STINQUE.com ~Serolf Divad
Since then, however, the GOP has learned to game the triangulation strategy. Its simple. Triangulation is just another word for meeting the opposition half way. If you are in the opposition and want to successfully counter (or game) your opponents triangulation strategy, all you need to do is move so absurdly to the right that your opponents triangulation position falls precisely where you want it to fall. Instead of your opponent playing you, you are now playing him.
I only half-blame Bill Clinton for this. He may have been the first to successfully implement the strategy, but its a lack of imagination on the part of recent Democrats that they continue to rely on the strategy, even as its painfully obvious that its working against them.'' STINQUE.com ~Serolf Divad
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You know why some think there's little difference between the two parties? [View all]
cthulu2016
Jul 2012
OP
Both parties have moved to the Right. Bush Sr. would fit comfortably into the Democratic leadership
leveymg
Jul 2012
#5
Maybe because another pending let's-send-even-more-jobs-to-foreign-countries "free-trade" agreement
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#13
Interesting statistics. In the same time period, how many jobs were created in foreign countries
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#28
"voters aren't likely to hear about them from us." POWER #1, your voice + your ears. nt
patrice
Jul 2012
#17
When's the last time two Democrats tried to out-do one another on who's the more liberal?
theaocp
Jul 2012
#18
When "Not as bad" is the selling point we get what they're selling..and that's all.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jul 2012
#19
We're not only telling people about these similarities, were embracing them.
progressoid
Jul 2012
#33