Female genital mutilation procedure 'hurted a lot,' child says

[Vesper]

24. No, just fucking understand the bias here and learn the science and stop emoting.

There is literally a histologial, procedural equivalency to these EXACT procedures, with one being socially acceptable in the US and one not being so. The only difference here is the age at which the tissue is removed, it's the same tissue, prepuce and clitoral hood are identical structures. Not all of the clitoris is removed, so actually depending on how it's done, women can do the same.

I understand why the procedure is done, but it's moronic to pretend that identical things are not equivalent simply based on function. If a girl is able to climax after a procedure based on the erectile tissue that's left, does that somehow make it less repugnant and barbaric?

Just fucking stop talking about orgasms already and figure out that cutting little kids genital structures is totally barbaric, and saying so shouldn't lead to people telling you to fucking stop pointing out the barbarity and the factual equivalence here.

There is literal direct comparison, and people need to fucking stop excusing genital mutilation for religious and social reasons PERIOD. It's fucking sick to state that mutilation is just fine, as long as orgasms are still possible. How fucking messed up is that statement?????