Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

exboyfil

(18,348 posts)
31. You are right
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 07:58 AM
Apr 2017

FDR wanted to add justices that would vote for his New Deal programs. He proposed adding six additional Justices. These situations are the same except FDR was smart enough to not state his political reasons in an open forum.

Here is a good write up of FDR's attempt. The key lines (and something a student of history like Donald Trump should pick up /s):


But Roosevelt kept Congressional leaders, his cabinet (save for Cummings) and the American people in the dark, deceiving even the shrewdest experts.


He justified his request not by contending that the court’s majority was reactionary, but by maintaining that a shortage of judges had resulted in delays to litigants because federal court dockets had become overburdened.


Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/when-franklin-roosevelt-clashed-with-the-supreme-court-and-lost-78497994/#jYcVKacVe8Ip0pi7.99
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! http://bit.ly/1cGUiGv
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

He's utterly dangerous. He's normalizing Sculpin Beauregard Apr 2017 #1
This is Trump being Trump FakeNoose Apr 2017 #30
Reich is wrong on this mythology Apr 2017 #2
I don't think it's impeachable, either gratuitous Apr 2017 #4
it's much worse than that cynical_idealist Apr 2017 #5
Welcome to DU! Delphinus Apr 2017 #29
Huge difference between tRump and Obama. Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2017 #10
Umm trump threatened retaliatory action because of rulings. Obama never did that!!! boston bean Apr 2017 #14
Meh jberryhill Apr 2017 #3
Not all speech is free, and all speech carries consequences. Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2017 #11
What speech isn't free? NobodyHere Apr 2017 #12
Incitement to riot, calls for violence like tRump at his rallies, speech that exploits minors, trea Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2017 #13
Can you please apply this to the "impeachable" statements in the OP? jberryhill Apr 2017 #20
Sure. Read post #11 previously written as a reply to you in this subthread. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2017 #23
Post #11 makes no sense jberryhill Apr 2017 #24
It is not incitement to riot. Duh. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2017 #25
Then would you care to explain what makes it criminal, or an abuse of power jberryhill Apr 2017 #26
If you read my post Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2017 #27
I did read your post jberryhill Apr 2017 #28
You are right exboyfil Apr 2017 #31
Here Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2017 #32
No right, not even a Constitutional one, is absolute. VOX Apr 2017 #16
Please explain the unlawfulness of the statements in the OP jberryhill Apr 2017 #21
It doesn't rise to an impeachable offense of any sort jberryhill Apr 2017 #19
So much is wasted on concern over Trump... defacto7 Apr 2017 #34
Noted; and added to the list. Now everybody move along, nothing doing. UTUSN Apr 2017 #6
And yet... ailsagirl Apr 2017 #7
I agree with the others, this is not impeachable. I'm afraid Reich is jumping the shark. thesquanderer Apr 2017 #8
Precisely jberryhill Apr 2017 #22
I have this inkling that the process for creating a new Circuit treestar Apr 2017 #9
May not be impeachable in and if it's own, yet trump is stirring the pot on this issue Lyricalinklines Apr 2017 #15
No Republican is going to move for impeachment. VOX Apr 2017 #17
I have accepted that, but things do keep slowly Alice11111 Apr 2017 #18
I'm heartened by the number of posts recognizing that Reich's hyperbole is silly. onenote Apr 2017 #33
All that was true back when we were a Constitutional Democracy world wide wally Apr 2017 #35
So, half of 9th circuit judges were appointed by Republicans... MrPurple Apr 2017 #36
18/25 appointed by Democrats means 7/25 appointed by not-Democrats ... just sayin' mr_lebowski Apr 2017 #37
There are already grounds, but the media tries to normalize, and.. mvd Apr 2017 #38
Gorsuch is an unelected judge, too. Beartracks Apr 2017 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Robert Reich: Trump's Lat...»Reply #31