Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)

37. 18/25 appointed by Democrats means 7/25 appointed by not-Democrats ... just sayin'

Reply to MrPurple (Reply #36)

Fri Apr 28, 2017, 12:53 PM

Apr 2017

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Robert Reich: Trump's Latest Tweetstorm Is Grounds for Impeachment [View all] babylonsister Apr 2017 OP

He's utterly dangerous. He's normalizing Sculpin Beauregard Apr 2017 #1

This is Trump being Trump FakeNoose Apr 2017 #30

Reich is wrong on this mythology Apr 2017 #2

I don't think it's impeachable, either gratuitous Apr 2017 #4

it's much worse than that cynical_idealist Apr 2017 #5

Welcome to DU! Delphinus Apr 2017 #29

Huge difference between tRump and Obama. Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2017 #10

Umm trump threatened retaliatory action because of rulings. Obama never did that!!! boston bean Apr 2017 #14

Meh jberryhill Apr 2017 #3

Not all speech is free, and all speech carries consequences. Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2017 #11

What speech isn't free? NobodyHere Apr 2017 #12

Incitement to riot, calls for violence like tRump at his rallies, speech that exploits minors, trea Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2017 #13

Can you please apply this to the "impeachable" statements in the OP? jberryhill Apr 2017 #20

Sure. Read post #11 previously written as a reply to you in this subthread. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2017 #23

Post #11 makes no sense jberryhill Apr 2017 #24

It is not incitement to riot. Duh. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2017 #25

Then would you care to explain what makes it criminal, or an abuse of power jberryhill Apr 2017 #26

If you read my post Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2017 #27

I did read your post jberryhill Apr 2017 #28

You are right exboyfil Apr 2017 #31

Here Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2017 #32

No right, not even a Constitutional one, is absolute. VOX Apr 2017 #16

Please explain the unlawfulness of the statements in the OP jberryhill Apr 2017 #21

It doesn't rise to an impeachable offense of any sort jberryhill Apr 2017 #19

So much is wasted on concern over Trump... defacto7 Apr 2017 #34

Noted; and added to the list. Now everybody move along, nothing doing. UTUSN Apr 2017 #6

And yet... ailsagirl Apr 2017 #7

I agree with the others, this is not impeachable. I'm afraid Reich is jumping the shark. thesquanderer Apr 2017 #8

Precisely jberryhill Apr 2017 #22

I have this inkling that the process for creating a new Circuit treestar Apr 2017 #9

May not be impeachable in and if it's own, yet trump is stirring the pot on this issue Lyricalinklines Apr 2017 #15

No Republican is going to move for impeachment. VOX Apr 2017 #17

I have accepted that, but things do keep slowly Alice11111 Apr 2017 #18

I'm heartened by the number of posts recognizing that Reich's hyperbole is silly. onenote Apr 2017 #33

All that was true back when we were a Constitutional Democracy world wide wally Apr 2017 #35

So, half of 9th circuit judges were appointed by Republicans... MrPurple Apr 2017 #36

18/25 appointed by Democrats means 7/25 appointed by not-Democrats ... just sayin' mr_lebowski Apr 2017 #37

There are already grounds, but the media tries to normalize, and.. mvd Apr 2017 #38

Gorsuch is an unelected judge, too. Beartracks Apr 2017 #39