General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)How have you arrived at the conclusion that someone is a "hater"?
If a politician holds a correct position about a particular issue, does that mean that he/she gets a free pass on saying offensive things about the Democratic Party and Democratic candidates?
Shouldn't loyal Democrats be permitted to complain and push back against the negative things that someone says about our party and our party's candidates?
Please explain to me... how does that make someone a "hater"?
When loyal Democrats express a sincerely held belief that someone else would be better-suited in the "outreach" role... how does having an sincere opinion about his performance, or about his suitability in a position, make someone a "hater"?
Where do you draw the line? Are loyal Democrats not permitted to have an opinion? These types of personal attacks (ie: calling names, making accusations) aren't really a compelling argument.
When people resort to the "hater" accusations, it tells me that they're approaching things from a disadvantaged position of weakness.