Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
38. It's not isolationism...it's a recognition that there's little more that can be achieved through war
Mon May 1, 2017, 02:27 AM
May 2017

It's not as though the ONLY way this country can have influence in the world is to kill people-and it's not as though there's much of anything else we can ever make better in the Arab/Muslim world through the use of force.

We can't get into a military conflict with Russia or China without ending the world, either.

Bernie would have supported World War Two...he's not an absolute pacifist.

It's the wars we fought before that(all of which, other than the Civil War, were reactionary and useless) and most of those we fought after that, few if any of which achieved anything, that he is skeptical about.

He's fine with engaging with the world...just not in ways that do damage to the world.

Can you really think of any place on the planet where the use of American or European force is making anything better or WOULD make anything better...at least for anybody other than the owners of armaments countries?

As to class war...you may have missed the part where FDR called the rich "the malefactors of great wealth". Roosevelt's greatness was that he was a hereditary multimillionaire who became a class traitor, and PROUDLY so.

And he's right that we should acknowledge that pretty much everything we ever did in Latin America(with the sole exception of the non-military part of the Alliance for Progress)was reactionary, unjust, and a waste of money, resources and lives.

(This thread isn't ABOUT Bernie, btw...it's about the idea of creating new New Deal-type programs-an idea that isn't unique to Bernie or his campaign. So I won't be posting any more about him in this thread and would ask everyone else not to try to turn this into a Bernie thread, either.)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well it's a reason for most of us to side eye that nostalgia because it goes hand in hand... bettyellen Apr 2017 #1
The New Deal didn't CAUSE Jim Crow...Jim Crow had been there since 1876. Ken Burch Apr 2017 #2
The new deal WAS the govt intervening to help some people while keeping others down. It not only bettyellen May 2017 #3
No, I don't think that's all that happened. You'd have ever right to be angry if I did think that. Ken Burch May 2017 #11
Didn't say you wanted to replicate anything. For fucks sake. bettyellen May 2017 #20
I agree that if you phrase it as "let's go BACK to the Thirties", that it wouldn't resonate Ken Burch May 2017 #29
If you scan this thread the level of denial about how perfect the program was bettyellen May 2017 #31
Redefine the proposition summaries needed, re-examine the breadth and width of any policies LanternWaste May 2017 #62
Your views are decidedly ahistorical and unsupported by any professional KingCharlemagne May 2017 #41
Before I spend the $10 to get the book ... moriah May 2017 #50
Thank you. Obviously that poster read one book that convinced them it was all roses... bettyellen May 2017 #52
The reviews of it are fairly good. moriah May 2017 #56
People believe what is convenient for them at times. And if you read this thread ... bettyellen May 2017 #57
bettyellen is an African-American woman. Ken Burch May 2017 #61
I guess we could debate the historical validity of BettyEllen's statement that "The new deal KingCharlemagne May 2017 #66
That was not the intent of the New Deal. Ken Burch May 2017 #67
This is utter horseshit melman May 2017 #7
Not to the many who were shut out of the opportunities it presented. bettyellen May 2017 #24
I alerted on that post. Ken Burch May 2017 #27
It wasn't horseshit, it was ignorant bullshit. - nt KingCharlemagne May 2017 #43
You need to listen to what she is saying. Ken Burch May 2017 #46
+Infinity - nt KingCharlemagne May 2017 #44
The New Deal was not "tainted." FDR was a giant among men. WinkyDink May 2017 #17
No more than everything in the US today is tainted by this being an country that makes war on others David__77 May 2017 #51
You may not be, but many are. radius777 May 2017 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author melman May 2017 #5
"white hipsters" melman May 2017 #6
Because of New Deal policies and it stabilizing lovemydogs May 2017 #9
Yet it's the economically secure that are hating on POC and equal rights for women right now. There bettyellen May 2017 #22
ALMOST Nobody is asking anyone to "wait around for equal rights". Ken Burch May 2017 #26
The post I responded to sure made excuses about people "having patience" for others civil rights bettyellen May 2017 #28
I agree that no one should tell you to "have patience". Ken Burch May 2017 #30
lovemydogs, no white people will ever have any right to lecture people of color about "patience" Ken Burch May 2017 #32
"The New Deal era was not a good time for PoC/women/gays"... NO ERA WAS! phleshdef May 2017 #12
But, A New Deal Veep turned President, Harry Truman lovemydogs May 2017 #14
That's simply not accurate. LanternWaste May 2017 #64
They didn't start, but those communities were excluded... Ken Burch May 2017 #47
I agree that there were exclusions and injustices(such as redlining)in the New Deal era. Ken Burch May 2017 #13
Bernie Sanders never had a problem with minorities or women, unlike some think lovemydogs May 2017 #16
No, Bernie never had a problem, but you're not listening to what she is saying. Ken Burch May 2017 #35
Who ever said anything about bringing back Jim Crow. lovemydogs May 2017 #8
The point has been made, and it is a valid point, Ken Burch May 2017 #15
WTH are you on about?! WinkyDink May 2017 #18
I'm addressing the justified anger and distrust bettyellen expressed upthread. Ken Burch May 2017 #25
I appreciate your effort to unify, but it wasn't well received by that poster. Buckeye_Democrat May 2017 #42
It was the Southern Democrats. lovemydogs May 2017 #19
We need to acknowledge that a wrong was done to communities of color then, though. Ken Burch May 2017 #33
"Civil rights and women's rights are now standard" you could have fooled us. bettyellen May 2017 #23
You're right, that was an indefensible thing for that poster to say. Ken Burch May 2017 #34
And no, civil rights and women's rights are NOT standard now. Ken Burch May 2017 #37
If anything. I'm glad you got to see and hear what we do, Ken. bettyellen May 2017 #45
What I said there is what I've always said AND what I've always believed. Ken Burch May 2017 #58
If you look at how often people want to remove the policies from any context on the bettyellen May 2017 #60
Anyone who thinks the New Deal was about anti equality lovemydogs May 2017 #10
It's about historical memory. Ken Burch May 2017 #21
During the New Deal period FDR supported the Allies... Expecting Rain May 2017 #36
It's not isolationism...it's a recognition that there's little more that can be achieved through war Ken Burch May 2017 #38
The Problem is There are Many People who would only support New Deal WITH Jim CRow JI7 May 2017 #39
FWIW, none of us are saying that we SHOULDN'T deal with the bigotry. Ken Burch May 2017 #48
I think the new deal was remarkable and even more remarkable for its time that it became law. Demsrule86 May 2017 #40
Killing Jim Crow indirectly killed the New Deal LeftInTX May 2017 #49
Yeah, the history is complicated. Good point. bettyellen May 2017 #54
The only thing is, even with what happened, Ken Burch May 2017 #59
yup, just like Obama's speech . people turn against things when black people or other non white men JI7 May 2017 #69
For a second I thought this was a Freedom caucus thread... bagelsforbreakfast May 2017 #53
The New Deal has been modified and improved loyalsister May 2017 #55
good point on a guaranteed basic income. Ken Burch May 2017 #68
Too late BainsBane May 2017 #63
I'm not gaslighting. Ken Burch May 2017 #65
... betsuni May 2017 #70
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Those who look to the New...»Reply #38