Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasProgresive

(12,730 posts)
3. Here's a link to a story on it.
Tue May 2, 2017, 08:42 AM
May 2017

The amendment as I understand it would put it to the states to keep people with per-existing conditions covered. Here's a link to the actual amendment, I confess that it is rather arcane with a disclaimer at the end, but the devil is in the details. High risk pools have been used by insurers for years to price those who develop chronic health problems out of the market. They would move the healthy to cheaper pools concentrating the less healthy. The low risk pool gets good rates the high risk pool gets extremely high rates.
"17 (b) NO LIMITING ACCESS TO COVERAGE FOR INDI-
VIDUALS WITH PREEXISTING CONDITIONS.—Nothing in
19 this Act shall be construed as permitting health insurance
20 issuers to limit access to health coverage for individuals
21 with preexisting conditions."


http://www.politico.com/f/?id=0000015b-a790-d120-addb-f7dc0ec90000

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/04/27/healthcare-repeal-pre-existing-conditions-moderates-237713

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chaffetz just had surgery...»Reply #3