Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

FairWinds

(1,717 posts) Tue May 2, 2017, 02:40 PM May 2017

Draw your own conclusions, but this analysis seems to confirm the views of the Warren, Sanders wing.

Here is what we used to call the "raw data" - the views of people who voted for Pres. Obama, but switched to Trump in 2016 or stayed home . .

https://www.washingtonpost.com/r/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2017/05/01/Editorial-Opinion/Graphics/Post-election_Research_Deck.pdf?tid=a_inl

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A Pro-Hillary think tank wants to discuss the future of the party . . [View all] FairWinds May 2017 OP

This message was self-deleted by its author hrmjustin May 2017 #1

It worked for me, it's a .pdf document. n/t PoliticAverse May 2017 #2

just checked my downloads. Thanks! hrmjustin May 2017 #3

Works for me too . . FairWinds May 2017 #4

Alrighty... hurple May 2017 #5

And all it took was 70k votes. Ninsianna May 2017 #6

"pro-Hillary" is "sneering"? FairWinds May 2017 #8