Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JoeStuckInOH

(544 posts)
7. If so, this might be a case where guns easily-at-hand played a huge role.
Wed May 3, 2017, 06:58 PM
May 2017

Mass shootings take planning and a sick determination/premeditation... most gun laws, permissive or not, are not going to curb true mass shootings.

Crimes of passion, like this kind of feels it might be, are largely influenced by weapons immediately at hand. Someone whose feelings are hurt but doesn't have a gun-in-hand already is probably unlikely to maintain the resolve to kill someone else after the time that would have been necessary to acquire a gun through legal means. Simply put... taking several steps and a few hours (or even days) in order to kill someone takes a helluva lot more commitment than simply going off half-cocked because a gun was already in your waistband.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»North Lake College shooti...»Reply #7