Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)

3. Yes- and it goes back to ALL the over hyping on the emails- allowing Wikileaks to frame the issues

Reply to Kber (Reply #2)

Wed May 3, 2017, 07:00 PM

May 2017

Because they were too lazy to report the whole story.
Same shit w Benghazi- they know damned well it was a partisan witch hunt they just hate admitting there's nothing there. They do this and ignore real scandals.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Comey Letter Probably Cost Clinton The Election, so why won't the media admit as much? [View all] still_one May 2017 OP

It's alarming that the media is still in denial; the facts are indisputable. SunSeeker May 2017 #1

A picture says a thousand words still_one May 2017 #4

Like 45, they won't accept responsibility. SharonAnn May 2017 #9

Because if the letter cost the election, the media is complicit Kber May 2017 #2

Yes- and it goes back to ALL the over hyping on the emails- allowing Wikileaks to frame the issues bettyellen May 2017 #3

If the letter is identified as the cause then there can be no justification for arguing that Russian MedusaX May 2017 #5

Obviously both impacted the election still_one May 2017 #7

They'd rather go on ad nauseam about how bad a candidate she was and what a... brush May 2017 #6

Well said brush still_one May 2017 #8