Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
6. Maybe, maybe not
Fri May 5, 2017, 01:12 PM
May 2017

There seem to be four defendants total in the sealed case filed January 3 in the Eastern District of VA:


Sealed Case Log (dft) vaedce 1:2017-sc-00001 890 01/03/2017
v. Sealed Case Log

Sealed Case Log (dft) vaedce 2:2017-sc-00001 890 01/03/2017
v. Sealed Case Log

Sealed Case Log (dft) vaedce 3:2017-sc-00001 890 01/03/2017
v. Sealed Case Log

Sealed Case Log (dft) vaedce 4:2017-sc-00001 890 01/03/2017
v. Sealed Case Log

(In general, the same case will be "counted" in PACER based on the ID of the defendants, which is why you get four listings of the same case for a search of "sealed" defendants)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"There have been sealed C...»Reply #6