Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(14,167 posts)

4. Wasn't there an administration official supervising?

Fri May 5, 2017, 08:05 PM

May 2017

Someone who might have said, ummm this is a SCIF... you can't photocopy this material?

This gets stranger and stranger.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump team copied documents and removed them from SCIF [View all] bathroommonkey76 May 2017 OP

Drip. applegrove May 2017 #1

So In One Sense Me. May 2017 #2

KGOP traitors suck Achilleaze May 2017 #3

not much we can do about it besides what we're doing onit2day May 2017 #7

Wasn't there an administration official supervising? Tatiana May 2017 #4

There are legitimate reasons to photocopy material in a SCIF jmowreader May 2017 #13

But her emails! TeamPooka May 2017 #5

Treason anyone? BarbD May 2017 #6

If by 'flirting you mean 'wallowing,' then yes Maynar May 2017 #17

We have a SCIF at work. If I did this, haele May 2017 #21

I read the article and still don't Ilsa May 2017 #8

Yeah I didn't see anything to support the title either Norbert9 May 2017 #10

What do you mean? This supports it: pnwmom May 2017 #11

There is ambiguity here Norbert9 May 2017 #14

Not just "viewing" them jmowreader May 2017 #18

That may be a real SCIF, but it's not the only kind. pnwmom May 2017 #19

Wow SunSeeker May 2017 #9

K & R L. Coyote May 2017 #16