Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Fixing the ACA like Hillary proposed now seems pretty damn progressive [View all]golfguru
(4,987 posts)130. If you were as old as I am,
You would have experienced great healthcare at very affordable prices in the 1960's & 1970's. Very low premiums and very low deductibles was the norm.
In 1980 we had a hospital bill of $31,000 and our out of pocket cost was $250! If you really want to know why healthcare costs so much, and is the no. 1 reason people go bankrupt, do intensive research on what new laws were enacted beginning around 1982 and on.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
135 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Fixing the ACA like Hillary proposed now seems pretty damn progressive [View all]
boston bean
May 2017
OP
+1, K&R!! We would be so much better off if that health care plan had passed. (eom)
StevieM
May 2017
#128
I still remember those Harry and Louise ads - and the Clintons' very witty attempt to defuse them.
tenorly
May 2017
#129
I remember that skit. It was really cool. Ultimately, it didn't matter though.
StevieM
May 2017
#131
People like to forget there was a general election where the choice was fix ACA or
boston bean
May 2017
#49
I brought that up because the OP was an implicit slam on single-payer supporters.
Ken Burch
May 2017
#44
I don't agree with Sarandon on that and don't know why you're bringing her up.
Ken Burch
May 2017
#56
I would so much rather be complaining that her plans weren't liberal enough.
NewDealProgressive
May 2017
#80
It's a shame you can't speak to how much better out Dem proposals were- I talk about it w people all
bettyellen
May 2017
#88
You'll of course, expound on whatever little point you're attempting to make, yes?
LanternWaste
May 2017
#9
No, actually. What you said was "Keyword 'seems.'" That implies that, though it seems
Squinch
May 2017
#17
Don't let the figure of speech hang you up. Her plan would have been a world better
Squinch
May 2017
#14
(on edit)hardly anyone here defends Sarandon. A few, but too few to really matter.
Ken Burch
May 2017
#45
I have no idea why that would be. It's a very odd assumption to make. I mean...
NurseJackie
May 2017
#82
Where exactly was the point of confusion? I imagine somewhere AFTER "Susan" but BEFORE "Sarandon"?
NurseJackie
May 2017
#120
Even with the threads you mention, most people here aren't defending Sarandon OR Stein.
Ken Burch
May 2017
#89
ROFL! I'm sure Susan Sarandon will survive the snarky comments about her. :-D
NurseJackie
May 2017
#101
Right, if we lose ACA kiss single payer goodbye...all those who secretly wanted the ACA to fail
Demsrule86
May 2017
#84
We are all screwed ...good luck...we will need a super majority to fix this.
Demsrule86
May 2017
#94
The Repug House bill is not a fix. It was -and did demolish many good aspects of ACA
riversedge
May 2017
#78
Anyone who didn't vote for Hillary officially owns a piece of what happened yesterday
Blue_Tires
May 2017
#99