Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

so when does this shit constitute interfering with a senate investigation? spanone May 2017 #1
Exactly SHRED May 2017 #2
When it's your party? DownriverDem May 2017 #10
That would probably depend on their reason for asking for the delay. cstanleytech May 2017 #22
"federal witness intimidation laws " dixiegrrrrl May 2017 #23
Trump and his Idiot Addvisors just Wellstone ruled May 2017 #3
icky stinky uggy. riversedge May 2017 #4
Mentioned this before. Wellstone ruled May 2017 #5
As Malcolm Nance would say, "target is getting buggy". . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #7
Funny you mentioned that. Wellstone ruled May 2017 #15
I dealt with someone with those issues for years. murielm99 May 2017 #17
If only DownriverDem May 2017 #11
The actions of a guilty man Mr. Ected May 2017 #6
Really good point! Kleveland May 2017 #8
THEM. - LOCK. THEM. UP. dchill May 2017 #21
This will work soon Johnny2X2X May 2017 #9
CNN's John King And Dana Bash Rip Trump For 'Witness Intimidation' of Sally Yates riversedge May 2017 #12
Seems Like itcfish May 2017 #13
So what? progressoid May 2017 #14
Party over country....business as usual. BigmanPigman May 2017 #18
impeach the bastard! barbtries May 2017 #16
Isn't that interefering with a Senate investigation? malaise May 2017 #19
Some goddamned leaker leaked! dchill May 2017 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hill Sources: White House...»Reply #18