Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cstanleytech

(28,355 posts)
22. That would probably depend on their reason for asking for the delay.
Mon May 8, 2017, 04:31 PM
May 2017

Frankly to me it doesnt make any sense for the Whitehouse to try and prevent her from giving testimony because she was not in on Trumps inner circle so I doubt she knows anything that would incriminate him or atleast not anything that the Repugnants would remove him from office for and it would take a hell of alot for them to decide to get off their butts and impeach him since having him as president is useful for them.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

so when does this shit constitute interfering with a senate investigation? spanone May 2017 #1
Exactly SHRED May 2017 #2
When it's your party? DownriverDem May 2017 #10
That would probably depend on their reason for asking for the delay. cstanleytech May 2017 #22
"federal witness intimidation laws " dixiegrrrrl May 2017 #23
Trump and his Idiot Addvisors just Wellstone ruled May 2017 #3
icky stinky uggy. riversedge May 2017 #4
Mentioned this before. Wellstone ruled May 2017 #5
As Malcolm Nance would say, "target is getting buggy". . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #7
Funny you mentioned that. Wellstone ruled May 2017 #15
I dealt with someone with those issues for years. murielm99 May 2017 #17
If only DownriverDem May 2017 #11
The actions of a guilty man Mr. Ected May 2017 #6
Really good point! Kleveland May 2017 #8
THEM. - LOCK. THEM. UP. dchill May 2017 #21
This will work soon Johnny2X2X May 2017 #9
CNN's John King And Dana Bash Rip Trump For 'Witness Intimidation' of Sally Yates riversedge May 2017 #12
Seems Like itcfish May 2017 #13
So what? progressoid May 2017 #14
Party over country....business as usual. BigmanPigman May 2017 #18
impeach the bastard! barbtries May 2017 #16
Isn't that interefering with a Senate investigation? malaise May 2017 #19
Some goddamned leaker leaked! dchill May 2017 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hill Sources: White House...»Reply #22